位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
不同通气模式对单肺通气影响的Meta分析
  • ISSN号:1673-4378
  • 期刊名称:《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:R195.1[医药卫生—卫生统计学;医药卫生—卫生事业管理;医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
  • 作者机构:扬州大学临床医学院、苏北人民医院麻醉科,225001
  • 相关基金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(81571936,81171838,81601679)
中文摘要:

目的采用Meta分析的方法评价压力控制通气(pressure controlled ventilation,PCV)与容量控制通气volume controlled ventilation,VCV)对术中单肺通气(one lung ventilation,OLV)患者呼吸力学及循环的影响。方法检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆,检索时间从建库至2016年2月。收集术中OLV使用PCV与VCV的临床随机对照试验(randomizedcontrolledtrial,RCT)。采用Cochrane协作网系统评价法评价纳入文献的质量,采用RevMan5.0软件对收集的患者资料进行Meta分析评价。结果共纳入14项研究,包括964例患者,其中PCV组480例,VCV组484例。与VCV组比较:在开胸前双肺通气时(T1),PCV组气道平均压mean airway pressure,Pmean)比值比(oddsratio,OR)[OR=-0.22,95%CI(-0.42,-0.01),P〈0.05]较低;OLV时(T2),PCV组气道峰压(peak airway pressure,Ppeak)[加权均数差(weighted mean difference,WMD)=-1.37,95%CI(-1.69,-1.05)]及气道平台压(pause pressure,Plateau)较低[WMD=-0.29,95%CI(-0,51,-0.07)],而PaO2高[WMD=0.52,95%CI(0.08,0.95)];关胸后双肺通气时(T3),PCV组Ppeak较低[WMD=-0.63,95%CI(-1.09,0.17)]。结论与VCV比较,OLV期间PCV可提供较低的气道压,可能是一种较好的通气模式。

英文摘要:

Objective To evaluate the effects of pressure controlled ventilation(PCV) and volume control ventilation(VCV) on the respiratory mechanics and circulation of patients during one-lung ventilation (OLV). Methods We searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane libraries for all randomized controlled trials (RCT) from the establishment of library to February 2016 about the use of PCV and VCV during operation. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the method recommended by Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analysis was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 14 studies were selected, including 964 patients (480 for PCV and 484 for VCV). Compared with group VCV, group PCV showed lower mean airway pressure(Pmean) [odds ratio(OR)=-0.22, 95%CI(-0.42, -0.01), P〈0.05] before chest opening(T1), lower peak airway pressure (Ppeak) [weighted mean difference (WMD) =- 1.37, 95 % CI(- 1.69,- 1.05)], lower plateau pressure (Plateau) airway pressure [WMD =- 0.29, 95%CI(-0.51,-0.07)] but higher pressure of arterial oxygen[WMD=0.52, 95%CI(0.08, 0.95)] during OLV(T2), and lower Ppeak [WMD=-0.63, 95%CI(-1.09, 0.17)] after chest closing(T3). Conclusions Compared with VCV, PCV results in low airway pressure during OLV, which may be a good ventilation model.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 主管单位:中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会
  • 主办单位:中华医学会 徐州医学院
  • 主编:
  • 地址:徐州市淮海西路99号
  • 邮编:221002
  • 邮箱:
  • 电话:0516-85708135
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1673-4378
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:32-1761/R
  • 邮发代号:28-44
  • 获奖情况:
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 美国化学文摘(网络版),中国中国科技核心期刊
  • 被引量:5680