位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
促红细胞生成素抑制氧化损伤诱导的人眼Müller细胞凋亡
  • ISSN号:1673-3770
  • 期刊名称:《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》
  • 分类:R77[医药卫生—眼科;医药卫生—临床医学]
  • 作者机构:[1]Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou325027, Zhejiang Province, China, [2]Department of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital, ShanghaiJiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092,China, [3]Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Children's MedicalCenter, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127, China, [4]Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospitalof College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou310006, Zhejiang Province, China, [5]Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Florida,Gainesville 32610, Florida, USA
  • 相关基金:Supported by the National Natural Science Funds of China(No.81371040); Shanghai Pujiang Program(No.15PJD028)
中文摘要:

AIM:To compare the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) monotherapy versus photodynamic therapy(PDT) and anti-VEGF combination treatment in age-related macular degeneration(AMD).METHODS:A computerized online search was performed using PubMed,Web of Science and the Cochrane Library.Studies that compared anti-VEGF monotherapy with PDT and anti-VEGF combination treatment of AMD and were designed as randomized controlled trials were included.The means and standard deviations of the best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA),central retinal thickness(CRT),number of treatments and proportions of patients who gained BCVA ≥15,10,5,or 0 letters at 12th month were extracted.A systematic review and Meta-analysis of the comparison of the two approaches was conducted using Review Manager 5.2.Subgroup.A sensitivity analysis was also performed.RESULTS:Eight studies were included.When the subgroup and sensitivity analysis was conducted,the results indicated that in the findings that included the monotherapy group and PDT(standard fluence,SF)group of Kaiser’s study,the patients in the monotherapy group had a better BCVA compared with the combination group at 12th month in the PDT(SF) subgroup[weighted mean difference(WMD):3.54;95% Cl:0.36 to 6.73;P=0.03],and there were more patients who gained ≥15 letters of BCVA in the monotherapy group compared with the combination group in the total result[odds ratio(OR):1.41;95% Cl:1.02 to 1.95;P=0.04].The same conclusion was obtained in the total result that included the monotherapy group and PDT(reduced fluence,RF)group of Kaiser’s study(OR:1.56;95% CI:1.13 to 2.15;P=0.007).However,there were no significant differences in the other indexes between the two therapies.CONCLUSION:We found that anti-VEGF monotherapy is more effective on the recovery of visual acuity than combination therapy and more researches with lager sample size should be performed to study on the effect of the two therapy approaches on CRT and number of injectio

英文摘要:

AIM:To compare the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) monotherapy versus photodynamic therapy(PDT) and anti-VEGF combination treatment in age-related macular degeneration(AMD).METHODS:A computerized online search was performed using PubMed,Web of Science and the Cochrane Library.Studies that compared anti-VEGF monotherapy with PDT and anti-VEGF combination treatment of AMD and were designed as randomized controlled trials were included.The means and standard deviations of the best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA),central retinal thickness(CRT),number of treatments and proportions of patients who gained BCVA ≥15,10,5,or 0 letters at 12~(th) month were extracted.A systematic review and Meta-analysis of the comparison of the two approaches was conducted using Review Manager 5.2.Subgroup.A sensitivity analysis was also performed.RESULTS:Eight studies were included.When the subgroup and sensitivity analysis was conducted,the results indicated that in the findings that included the monotherapy group and PDT(standard fluence,SF)group of Kaiser's study,the patients in the monotherapy group had a better BCVA compared with the combination group at 12~(th) month in the PDT(SF) subgroup[weighted mean difference(WMD):3.54;95% Cl:0.36 to 6.73;P=0.03],and there were more patients who gained ≥15 letters of BCVA in the monotherapy group compared with the combination group in the total result[odds ratio(OR):1.41;95% Cl:1.02 to 1.95;P=0.04].The same conclusion was obtained in the total result that included the monotherapy group and PDT(reduced fluence,RF)group of Kaiser's study(OR:1.56;95% CI:1.13 to 2.15;P=0.007).However,there were no significant differences in the other indexes between the two therapies.CONCLUSION:We found that anti-VEGF monotherapy is more effective on the recovery of visual acuity than combination therapy and more researches with lager sample size should be performed to study on the effect of the two therapy approa

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 主管单位:中华人民共和国教育部
  • 主办单位:山东大学
  • 主编:潘新良
  • 地址:济南市经十路17923号
  • 邮编:250061
  • 邮箱:ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
  • 电话:0531-88395259
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1673-3770
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:37-1437/R
  • 邮发代号:24-43
  • 获奖情况:
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊中国科技核心期刊中国...
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 美国化学文摘(网络版),英国农业与生物科学研究中心文摘,波兰哥白尼索引,美国剑桥科学文摘,中国中国科技核心期刊
  • 被引量:4052