对2种风险度量方法均值-VaR模型和均值-CVaR模型进行混合.首先对在险值(VaR)和条件在险值(CVaR)具有的性质如次可加性进行论述和比较,其中在计算条件在险值(CVaR)时,同时也能得到在险值(VaR),因此CVaR可对风险进行双限监管,比单纯的VaR更加保险;然后对均值-VaR模型和均值-CVaR模型赋予不同的权重,得出混合后的模型的相关性质,使混合后的模型在某种程度上优于单个模型的投资组合;最后对深市股票进行实证分析.
This paper employs two methods of r isk measurement ( the mean-VaR model and the mean-CVaR model) ? First of all, value at risk (VaR) and conditional value at risk (CVaR) with the properties of additivity are discussed and compared. Thereinto,when calculating the conditional value at risk (CVaR) , we can also get value at risk (VaR) . Therefore, CVaR can double limit regulate the risks, it is safer than VaR. Then different weights are given to the average-VaR model and the mean-CVaR model and related properties of the mixed mod-el are summed up. The mixed model to some extent is better than that of a single model portfolios. Finally, the Shenzhen stock is sampled for empirical analysis.