位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
冠状动脉造影前后有创及无创血压监测的临床价值
  • ISSN号:0253-3685
  • 期刊名称:江苏医药
  • 时间:2012.10
  • 页码:2390-2392
  • 分类:R541[医药卫生—心血管疾病;医药卫生—临床医学;医药卫生—内科学]
  • 作者机构:[1]南京医科大学第一附属医院心脏病科,江苏省210029, [2]滨州医学院附属医院老年医学科
  • 相关基金:国家自然科学基金(81170181)
  • 相关项目:ABCB1、CYP2C19、PON1基因多态性对植入支架的冠心病患者氯吡格雷低反应性及预后的影响
中文摘要:

目的评估冠状动脉造影对血压的影响及不同部位有创血压和无创血压监测的临床价值。方法连续人选行冠状动脉造影者128例;其中,经桡动脉路径者31例,经股动脉路径者97例。记录冠状动脉造影前后经桡动脉、股动脉、主动脉根部监测的有创血压和肱动脉水平测量的无创血压。结果在经股动脉路径造影时,术前收缩压监测结果:股动脉压[(163.8±25.1)mmHg]〉中心动脉压[(142.8±24.1)mmHg]〉无创血压[(130.5±22.3)mmHg];舒张压监测结果:中心动脉压[(85.2±12.4)mmHg]〉股动脉压[(81.8±12.0)rainHg]〉无创血压[(77.9±12.1)mmHg]。股动脉造影前后收缩压和舒张压均无显著变化。在经桡动脉路径造影时,术前收缩压监测结果:桡动脉压[(157.2±22.8)mmHg]〉中心动脉压[(144.9±20.8)mmHg-]〉无创血压[(133.2±23.2)mmHg];经桡动脉造影后,中心动脉收缩压较术前显著升高(P〈0.05),但桡动脉收缩压、无创收缩压和舒张压较术前均显著下降(P〈0.05)。结论不同部位有创血压与无创血压监测结果不可相互替代,临床医生应根据不同血压监测结果和患者实际情况对患者进行适当的诊治。

英文摘要:

Objective To evaluate the effect of coronary artery angiography(CAG) on blood pressure and the clinical implications of the noninvasive blood pressure and invasive blood pressures monitored from different locations. Methods One hundred and twenty-eight patients received CAG were consecutivelylrecruited in this study. The procedures Were performed through the radial artery in 31 cases and through the femoral artery in 97 cases. Invasive blood pressures were monitored at the levels of radial artery, femoral artery and aorta root, and noninvasive blood pressures were monitored by a sphygmomanometer at the level of brachial artery. Results For the transfemoral artery procedure,the invasive systolic blood pressure(SBP) before CAG was in an order of femoral artery pressure [(163.8±25.1 )mm Hg]〉 center artery pressure[( 142.8 ± 24.1 ) mm Hg] 〉 noninvasive pressure[( 130. 5±22.3) mm Hg]. The diastolic blood pressure(DBP) was in an order of center artery pressure[(85.2±12.4) mm Hg]〉 femoral artery pressure [(81.8 ± 12.0) mm Hg] 〉 noninvasive pressure[(77.9 ± 12.1) mmHg]. Neither SBP nor DBP significantly changed after trans-femoral CAG. For the transradial artery procedure, the invasive SBP before CAG was in an order of radial artery pressure [( 157. 2 ± 22.8) mmHg] 〉 center artery pressure [( 144. 9 ± 20. 8) mmHg]〉noninvasive pressure [(133.2±23.2) mmHg]. After transradial CAG, the center SBP was significantly increased(P〈0. 05), but the systolic radial arterial pressure, systolic noninvasive blood pressure and the diagnostic noninvasive blood pressure were all significantly decreased (P〈0. 05).Conclusion The invasive (monitored at different levels) and noninvasive blood pressures are not interchangeable. Doctors should refer to different blood pressures monitored along with different clinical settings and finally initiate different managements.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《江苏医药》
  • 北大核心期刊(2011版)
  • 主管单位:江苏省卫生厅
  • 主办单位:江苏省人民医院
  • 主编:
  • 地址:南京市广州路300号
  • 邮编:210029
  • 邮箱:yiya@chinajournal.net.cn
  • 电话:025-57711507 83216587
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:0253-3685
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:32-1221/R
  • 邮发代号:28-4
  • 获奖情况:
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊,全国临床医学核心期刊
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 美国化学文摘(网络版),日本日本科学技术振兴机构数据库,中国中国科技核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2004版),中国北大核心期刊(2008版),中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2000版)
  • 被引量:32760