目的探讨血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)单核苷酸多态性位点rs2285666和rs2106809及血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)插入/缺失(I/D)多态性与妊娠糖尿病(GDM)孕妇及正常孕妇妊娠中晚期血脂水平的相关性。方法选取GDM孕妇344例,糖耐量正常(NOT)孕妇417例。采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)及聚合酶链反应-限制性片断长度多态性(PCR—RFLP)方法检测ACE2及ACE基因多态性,并于孕24~28周留取受试者空腹静脉血检测总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDLC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDLC)、载脂蛋白A1(ApoA1)、载脂蛋白B(ApoB)和脂蛋白a[Lp(a)]水平。结果GDM和NGT两组间ACE2 rs2285666、rs2106809和ACE I/D基因型及等位基因分布频率均无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。GDM患者的TG水平显著高于NGT孕妇[(2.69±0.95)mmol/L vs(2.38±0.81)mmol/L](P〈0.05),HDLC水平显著低于NGT孕妇[(2.11±0.46)mmol/L vs(2.20±0.43)mmol/L](P〈0.05)。将受试者按ACE2 rs2285666、rs2106809ACE和ACE I/D基因型分组,ACE DD基因型组TC、LDLC水平高于ACEⅡ组,分别为(6.33±1.09)mmol/L vs(6.05+0.96)mmol/L、(3.62±0.89)mmol/L vs(3.39±0.79)mmol/L(P〈0.05),进一步将受试者分别按ACE I/D基因型分组,NGT组DD基因型受试者TC和LDLC水平明显高于Ⅱ基因型组,分别为(6.46±1.20)mmol/L vs(6.06±0.95)mmol/L和(3.73±1.03)mmol/L vs(3.43±0.77)mmol/L(P〈0.05),而GDM组各基因型组之间各血脂水平无显著差异。结论ACE I/D多态性与孕妇孕中晚期血脂水平有关,NGT组DD基因型孕妇比Ⅱ基因型孕妇的TC、LDL水平高,GDM可能也存在ACE I/D多态性对孕妇妊娠中晚期血脂水平的影响。
Objective: To investigate whether the angiotensin converting enzyme2(ACE2) single nucleotide poly- morphism rs2285666, rs2106809 and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D) poly- morphism are associated with the lipid profiles in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or normal glucose tolerance(NGT).Methods: We recruited 344 pregnant women with GDM, 417 pregnant women with NGT. The ACE2 rs2285666, rs2106809 and ACE I/D polymorphisms were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), and serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), HDL cholesterol (HDLC), LDL cholesterol (LDLC), ApoA1, ApoB and Lp(a) were measured in all subjects during gestational age 24-28 weeks. Results. There was no significant difference in genotype and allele frequencies of ACE2 rs2285666, rs2106809 and ACE I/D polymorphism between GDM and NGT group(P〉0.05). The TG level in GDM group was much higher than that in NGT group(2.69±0. 95 mmol/L vs 2.38±0. 81 mmol/L, P〈0. 05), and HDLC level in GDM group was much lower than that in NGT group (2.11±0.46 mmol/L vs 2.20±0.43 mmol/L, P〈0.05). When all subjects were divided into three groups according to ACE2 rs2285666 ,rs2106809 and ACE I/D SNP genotype, respectively, the TC, LDLC levels in ACE DD group were much higher than those in ACE II group (6.33 ±1.09 mmol/L vs 6.05±0.96 mmol/L and 3.62±0.89 mmol/L vs 3.39±0. 79 retool/L, P〈0.05) and there was no significant difference in lipid levels among other genotype groups. Furthermore, when GDM and NGT group were divided into three subgroups according to ACE I/D SNP genotype, respectively, NGT DD genotyped subjects had higher TC and LDLC level than NGT II genotyped subjects (6.46±1.20 mmol/L vs 6.06±0. 95 mmol/L and 3.73±1.03 mmol/L vs 3.43±0.77 mmol/L, P〈0.05), whereas, there was no difference in lipid profile among each GDM ge