中文摘要：

利用CGSS、POI、道路网等数据，通过多层线性模型分析中国城市建成环境对居住安全感的影响。总体来看，混合型、密路网、紧凑型的建成环境对个体的居住安全感具有显著的负向影响。而“街道眼”的保护机制并非是自动产生的，唯有在社区凝聚力较高、人口构成较为同质的社会环境下，传统城市空间形态才能起到增进居住安全感的作用。因此，不应把当前“窄马路、密路网、开放型”的规划转型仅仅视为一项空间设计工作，而须与社区发展相结合，以使“街道眼”的功效得以充分发挥。

英文摘要：

In the discipline of criminal geography, there always exists opposite theoretical views of the impact of urban built-up environment on sense of residential security. James Jocabs proposed the concept of ＇street eyes＇ and appreciated its surveillance role in enhancing the sense of security, while the defensible space theory proposed by Newman regarded large flow of human traffic as public safety risk. This conflicting theoretical ex- planation incurred hesitation and confusion between aggregated design approach and segregated design ap- proach. The different empirical findings and planning ideas stemmed from significant divergent built environ- ment and social environment in various regions throughout the world. Owing to the existing research only car- ried out in European and American cities, it needs to be reexamined which theory has more explanatory power in Chinese context. Via Chinese General Social Survey data in the year of 2010, point of interest and road net- work data, this article analyzed the influence of urban built environment and its interaction role with social en- vironment on sense of residential security in 278 Chinese urban communities through hierarchical linear mod- eling for the first time. This research demonstrated that mixed-used land measured by entropy index of POI functional types, compact road network measured by road density or proportion of secondary and slip road ar- ea, and high utilizing density measured by population density or POI density had a significant negative effect on sense of residential security overall. On the contrary, when built environment was relatively sparse, and had single land use and large block size, people would have a higher sense of security. It should be noted that the impact of urban built environment on sense of security is not invariable, and the ＇ street eyes＇ would not spon- taneously play their defending roles until the community had strong cohesion, abundant social capital or ho- mogenously composed. With the increase of community cohesion