中文摘要：

在采用序列DEA-Malmquist指数计算我国各地生产率的过程中,加入能源消耗及污染气体排放等指标,计算1998-2012年期间考虑环境因素下的生产效率,并将该指标与传统意义上同一时段内计算出来的全要素生产率进行比较论证,在此基础上实证分析我国现行府财政分权体制对于这两类生产率影响的差异。研究的主要结论表明：财政分权对于各省区环境TFP的影响要明显大于传统TFP,财政分权在短期内可以激励地方政府对污染排放问题进行更好的治理,从而提升环境全要素生产率,但在长期内仅仅依靠放权给地方政府反倒会使得经济发展以及环境保护矛盾恶化。此外,产业结构、研发能力、FDI以及收入水平等对两类生产率也有着不同程度的影响。

英文摘要：

Using sequence DEA-Malmquist index,the paper calculates Chinese productivity,adds the energy consumption and pollution emissions into index system,and calculates the TFP considering environmental factors during the period of 1998-2012.Comparing the environmental TFP and traditional TFP,we analyze the impact differences brought by the central and local government＇s fiscal decentralization system in terms of the two kinds of TFP.The main conclusion of the study shows that the influence of fiscal decentralization on environment TFP is significantly greater than the traditional TFP,and fiscal decentralization in the short term can encourage local governments to govern pollution emissions better,so can improve the environment TFP,but in the long term it will make the deterioration of the economic development and environmental protection contradiction only relies on the power to the local government.In addition,the industrial structure,RD,FDI and income levels have different degrees of influence on the two kinds of TFP.