中文摘要：

多因素综合评价法能全面考虑各种与土地质量直接相关的因素，不仅包含了影响土地价值的经济因素，而且包含了其他因素。本文在分析已有文献的基础上，构建了针对城市土地综合定级评价的指标体系，运用特尔斐法结合方差和均值修正确定指标体系权重，选取银川市建成区的六个样本点，结合多因素综合评价法进行了实例分析，通过对评价结果进行分析，可知分等定级结果符合银川市城市发展建设的实际情况。

英文摘要：

The factors directly associated with land quality can be considered by the method of multi-factor comprehensive evaluation. This method combines qualitative and quantitative analysis, transforms experience into scientific indexes, and converts the direct judgment on the complicated things into the single judgment on some respects of the thing, which can decrease the subjectivity, and ensure the scientific classifications on land gradation. This paper chose multi-factor comprehensive evaluation to estimate land gradation. The main idea was that location factors influencing land grade were chosen in order to determine the gradation factors with land location conditions. The weights of all factors were given by their importance of influencing degree. Then, the scores of all factors and indexes were calculated with the uniform standard in the appointed sample unit. In view of the above, the land gradation was obtained. Firstly, this paper introduced the method of multi-factor comprehensive evaluation and the related equations. Then, based on analyzing the available literature, the paper constructed the index system of urban land gradation. Eight factors were selected, which are commercial-service prosperity, road access, external transport convenience, public transport convenience, public service maturity, cultural-sport facility maturity, population density, and urban planning, to construct the index system including 22 indexes on urban land gradation. Thirdly, the weights of factor layers were obtained by Delphi method with the amendment of mean and variance. In practical terms, this study designed the table of expert surveys so as to collect the ideas of expert panel. In all, thirty two experts accepted survey in the first round. The samples adopted had 30. According to the results of mean and variance to all samples, the initial views of the weights were determined. For reasons given above, the final weights were given by collecting the ideas of 10 experts in the second round. Finally, a case study was processed