由于相关法律法规没有理顺“地、业、会”之间的关系,这使“一业多会”成为可能。行业协会组织边界的约束、部门条块分割及其利益诉求、企业家的利益驱动等使这种可能转化为现实。与“一业一会”相比,“一业多会”通过扩大入会率和矫正寡头化现象而更具有代表性。因此,在制度设计上,应该通过培育竞争机制、民主机制和绩效评估机制以及取消政治激励来推进“一业多会”的发展。
Without clear and rigid reguahions on the relationship among district, industry and association, the practice of the so-called many associations in one industry acquires its feasibility, which can be further turned into reality by the impetus like the limits of industrial association, divided department and its profit-pursuit and entrepreneurs' drive for interest. In contrast to the practice of one association in one industry, the former, by means of increasing its membership and rectifying the phenomenon of oligarchy, enjoys more representativeness. Therefore, it is necessary, in system construction, to cultivate competition, democracy and performance evaluation, rather than political encouragement, to promote the development of many associations in one industry.