伴随人文地理学空间概念的“社会转向”和社会学中的”空间转向”,社会空间问题成为当今学术研究的一个新的热点,“空间的生产”理论则.作为一种新的理论视角,日益被越来越多的中国学者所认同和运用。然而,总体来看,目前国内对空间的生产的研究还有待完善,尤其缺乏一个整体的、能够跨越学科界限的理论框架。本文在梳理现有国内外有关空间的生产的研究的基础上,根据研究对象将现有理论归纳为三大方向(宏观、微观和一般研究),然后,重点从宏观和微观角度对现有研究进行了归纳;借鉴卡斯特尔斯等人的分析框架,构建了包含在地化和去地化两大核心过程的空间的生产理论分析框架,并基于此框架指出,资本的循环过程、转型期的社会运动、政府的企业化和土地利用政策、规划和空间正义是顺应中国实际需求的、未来有待进一步深化的研究话题。最后,作者也指出了空间生产研究方法上需要注意的集中倾向。
With the increasing needs for more detailed and comprehensive explanations of current transitions in China and the convergent merging "turns" in geography and sociology, more integrated explorations of social-spatial processes are called for to confront the complicated challenges in China. Under this background, the researches on the production of space are becoming a central issue in Chinese human geography. To make better understanding of previous main researches on the production of space, this paper sorts them out into three main streams and tries to give a brief introduction of the two from macro and micro perspectives. For the macro-researches, capital flows, people and space interaction can partly explains the "special fix", "scalar fix" and "gentrification". For the micro-researches, actors, network and space play important role in the "collective movements" and "everyday life practices". The philosophical researches concern the spatial epistemology, ontology and dialects. This paper focus on the first two streams. Borrowing the ideas from Castells, the authors generalize an analytic framework of the production of space, which contains the processes of territorialization and delocalization of capital flows, social actions and institutional structures. Based on this framework, the authors point out that the research topics, which are suitable for China in the future, should include the "detailed process of capital circuits", the "social movements in the period of China's social transition", the "entrepreneurial governments" and "land use policies, planning and spatial justice".