位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
LI-RADS CT分类标准对肝细胞癌的诊断效能评价
  • ISSN号:1000-0313
  • 期刊名称:《放射学实践》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:R814.42[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学;医药卫生—放射医学;医药卫生—临床医学] R735.7[医药卫生—肿瘤;医药卫生—临床医学]
  • 作者机构:昆明医科大学第三附属医院云南省肿瘤医院放射科,昆明650118
  • 相关基金:云南省教育厅基金(2014Y169); 云南省科技厅-昆明医科大学应用基础研究联合专项基金(2014FB062;2015FB071)
中文摘要:

目的:探讨肝脏影像报告和数据管理系统(LI-RADS)CT分级诊断标准对肝细胞癌(HCC)的临床诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析158例肝癌高危患者肝脏病变患者的上腹部CT资料,并根据LI-RADS分类标准对病变进行分析评估,并与临床客观诊断结果进行比较。结果:158例患者的CT图像共发现179个肝内病灶,其中LI-RADS 1~5类病灶共167个:1类和2类48个,临床客观诊断结果均为良性(阴性预测值为100%);3类4个;4类6个,其中2个病灶的术后病理结果为HCC(阳性预测值为33.3%);5类109个,其中103例为HCC(阳性预测值为94.5%)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.89(P〈0.001)。若将LI-RADS 1~2类病灶归为阴性,3~5类病灶归为阳性,LI-RADS对诊断肝癌的总符合率为91.6%(153/167),检出HCC的敏感度为100%(105/105),特异度为77.4%(48/62),阳性预测值为88.2%(105/119),阴性预测值为100%(48/48)。若将LI-RADS 3类病灶排除,1~2类病灶归为阴性,4~5类病灶归为阳性,LI-RADS对肝内已检出病灶的诊断符合率为93.9%(153/163),检出HCC的敏感度为100%(105/105),特异度为82.8%(48/58),阳性预测值为91.3%(105/115),阴性预测值为100%(48/48)。结论:LI-RADS分类标准对HCC的CT诊断具有很好的诊断效果,有利于提高CT诊断报告的准确性。

英文摘要:

Objective:To evaluate the application value of liver imaging reporting and data system(LI-RADS)CT classification in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods:158patients at high risk of HCC who underwent CT examination were enrolled.All the CT images were analyzed and the lesions were categorized into 5scales according to the LI-RADS.The diagnostic results of MRI LI-RADS were compared with the results of clinical objective diagnosis.Results:179lesions were detected in all 158 patients,including 167 lesions were diagnosed as LI-RADS category 1~5.Of167 lesions,48lesions in category 1or 2were benign lesions proved by clinical data(negative predictive value 100%).Of the four lesions in category 3,there was no HCC.Of the six lesions in category 4,there were 2 HCCs(positive predictive value 75%).Of 109 lesions in category 5,there were 103HCCs(positive predictive value 100%).The area underneath the ROC curve(AUC)was 0.89 with statistic significance(P〈0.001).If hepatic lesions in category 1and 2were considered as negative and lesions in category 3~5considered as positive,the accuracy,sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value(PPV)and negative predictive value(NPV)of the LI-RADS classification for the diagnosis of HCC were 91.6%,100%,77.4%,88.2% and 100% respectively.If lesions in category 1and 2were considered as negative,lesions in category 4~5were considered as positive and lesions in category 3were excluded,the accuracy,sensitivity,specificity,PPV and NPV of the LI-RADS classification for diagnosis of HCC were 93.9%,100%,82.8%,91.3% and 100% respectively.Conclusion:LIRADS CT classification provides strong validity for the diagnosis of HCC,and is very useful to improve the accuracy of CT reports.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《放射学实践》
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 主管单位:教育部
  • 主办单位:华中科技大学同济医学院
  • 主编:胡道予
  • 地址:武汉市解放大道1095号同济医院
  • 邮编:430030
  • 邮箱:fsxsjzz@163.com fsxsjzz@vip.126.com
  • 电话:027-83662875
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1000-0313
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:42-1208/R
  • 邮发代号:38-122
  • 获奖情况:
  • 中文科技核心期刊,中国科学引文数据库统计源期刊,科技部论文统计源期刊
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 中国中国科技核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2008版),中国北大核心期刊(2014版)
  • 被引量:23059