目的:对乌头汤及其加减方临床对照研究文献进行质量评价,了解其论文发表情况和研究水平。方法:检索1979年1月—2013年6月收录于中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网中国期刊全文数据库、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库、万方数据库中乌头汤的临床对照研究文献,以"乌头汤"为关键词,匹配"精确"查找,进行检索,对纳入文献进行质量评价。结果:符合纳入标准的有56篇文献,有10篇文献对随机化方法进行了描述;提及基线资料可比性的有42篇;有17篇文献报道了不良反应情况;4篇文献有随访情况的报道。结论:乌头汤及其加减方临床对照研究文献的质量较高,但在样本量估算、随机方法的描述、组间基线资料报道、疗效的统计学分析、随访等方面还存在不足,有待改进和提高。
Objective: To evaluate the clinical control research literature quality of Aconiti Decoction and its Modified Prescription,understand their publications and research. Methods: The clinical control research literature about Aconiti Decoction with match "exact" collected in Chinese biomedical literature database,cnki China periodical full-text databases,Weipu Chinese science and technology periodical full-text databases,and Wanfang databases from Jan. of 1979 to Jun. of 2013 were searched and their qualities were evaluated. Results: 56 articles met the inclusion criteria; 10 describes randomization method; 42 involved baseline data comparability; 17 reported the adverse reactions; And 4 had follow-up reports. Conclusion: The articles' quality on clinical control research literature of Aconiti Decoction and its Modified Prescription is high,but there are still shortcomings such as estimating sample sizes,description of randomization,baseline data reports between groups,statistical analysis of curative effect and followup. which should be enhanced.