中文摘要：

本研究考察不同权威目击者对儿童道德情绪判断与归因的影响。实验以90个7～8岁儿童为被试，采用3（行为情境）×3（目击权威类型）的组间设计，考察了不同权威目击者条件下儿童对不同行为者的道德情绪判断和归因。结果发现，目击权威的类型对儿童道德情绪判断与归因的影响在不同的行为情境条件下是不同的。成人权威目击条件下，儿童对亲社会行为者的道德情绪判断分数最高，即更多判断他们会感到高兴，对损人者的道德情绪判断分数最低，即更多判断他们会感到不高兴。而同龄权威和非权威目击条件下儿童对不同行为者的情绪判断分数不存在显著差异。不同权威目击条件下儿童对行为者的情绪归因存在显著差异，奖惩定向更多出现在成人权威目击条件。研究显示，成人权威对儿童道德情绪的培养具有重要意义，能够显著影响儿童的道德情绪判断与归因。

英文摘要：

Previous studies have focused on the impact of teacher as an important authority in children’s life witnessing different kinds of behavior on children’s moral emotion judgment and attribution. And the results indicated that this kind of witness could lead some changes for children’s moral emotion judgment and attribution to different actors, though also some inconformity existed in these results. However, some limitations still exist. For one thing, some researchers have proved that even preschool children could accept the status of their peers as authorities. But whether this kind of authority could have impact on children’s moral emotion judgment and attribution, we have no ideas. For another thing, although some studies have found that when a teacher witnessed an actor’s（such as victimizer’s） behavior, children’s moral emotion judgment to this kind of actor could have some alteration in contrast to the condition no people witnessed. Whether this effect was due to the authority status of the teacher or the interruption of an unexpected person, this question should also be considered. In this study, we chose teacher as adult authority and monitor in class as peer authority, and also chose an ordinary student in class as non-authority, adopting a 3（types of behavior contexts）×3 （types of witnesses） between subject design, with 90 7～8 aged children as participants, aiming at inspecting children’s moral emotion judgment and attribution to different behavior contexts in different authority witnesses condition. As the result showed, the main effect of behavior contexts was significant. Comparing to the victimizing context and the context of failing to act prosocially, children tended to judge the actor’s emotion would be happier in prosocial context. Besides, there was also a significant interaction between types of behavior contexts and the types of witnesses. Subjects tended to judge the actor would feel unhappier when adult-authority（ vs. peer-authority ＆ non-authority） witne