中文摘要：

[目的／意义]在多属性评价视角下，学术期刊影响力指标时间轴并不统一，存在时间异质性，评价对象涉及期刊创刊以来的所有论文被引、过去5年论文被引、过去两年论文被引、评价当年被引等等，迫切需要解决这个问题。[方法／过程]以CSSCI科技管理类期刊为例，提出了两个新指标：隔年影响因子、隔年h指数，并基于灰色关联分析和期刊被引数据统计，验证了这两个指标的合理性。[结果／结论]期刊被引指标的设计必须尊重时效性、鲁棒性、年度内评价等原则；多属性评价时，期刊评价被引指标必须尽量保证时间轴一致；来源指标与隔年被引指标数据均来自于期刊载文当年数据，多属性评价时间轴本质上只有一个。

英文摘要：

Under the perspective of multi-attribute evaluation, the timeline of academic periodical＇ s influence index is not unified, and has the temporal heterogeneity. The evaluation objects involve in all the cited papers since periodicals started, the cited papers in the past five years, the cited papers in the past two years, the cited paper in the current year and so on. [ Method/process~ To solve this problem, this paper takes the S＆T management journals included in CSSCI for example, and puts forward two new indexes of impact factor of every other year and the h index of every other year. Then based on grey relational analysis and the cited periodical＇ s data statistics, the rationality of two indexes is verified. [ Re- suit/conclusion] Research shows that the design of journal＇s citation index must respect the principles of timeliness, robustness, annual evaluation and so on ; the evaluation of journal＇ s citation index must ensure the timeline consistent as possible when carrying out the multi-attribute evaluation; source index and citation indexes data ofevery other year both come from the papers published in that year, and multi-attribute evaluation timeline has only one essentially.