中文摘要：

从CSSCI中选取文学、历史学、哲学、法学、经济学和图书馆、情报与文献学6个文科学科学者2002—2006年的数据，计算出学者的被引次数C、被引篇数P、篇均被引次数CPP和h指数。分析表明被引次数C与h指数的相关性最大，计算表明对文学和历史学而言G1nzel—Schubert公式的估计值更接近实际h指数，而其余学科的h指数大多数数据落在Hirsch公式和Egghe—Rousseau公式估计值之间。在所研究的6个文科领域中，Hirsch公式估计值与实际h指数的Pearson相关性较好。

英文摘要：

Based on the data of CSSCI database from 2002 to 2006, the authors choose six fields （Literature, History, Philosophy, Law, Economy, Library and Information and Documentation） and calculate both scholars＇ traditional bibliometrie indicators （ papers, citations and citations per paper） and their h-indices. The results show that the Spearman eorrelations are largest between citations and h-indices. The estimating values on GI？ nzel-Sehubert formula are closer to true h-indices in the fields of literature and history, while other values of h-indices fall between Hirseh formula and Egghe-Rousseau formula. And the Pearson correlation between Hirseh computing values and true h-indices looks better in humanities and social sciences.