位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
评判性思维对剖宫产妇女健康教育及心理状况的影响
  • ISSN号:1001-1978
  • 期刊名称:《中国药理学通报》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:R473.71[医药卫生—护理学;医药卫生—临床医学]
  • 作者机构:[1]浙江省永康市第一人民医院产科,浙江永康321300, [2]中南大学湘雅医院妇产科,湖南长沙410008
  • 相关基金:国家自然科学基金(30672241)
中文摘要:

目的 探讨分析评判性思维对剖宫产妇女健康教育及心理状况的影响效果.方法将我院收治的1200 例剖宫产妇女随机分为观察组与对照组,每组600 例,观察组妇女进行评判性思维的健康教育,对照组妇女进行常规的健康教育,对比分析两组妇女健康教育效果以及心理状况表现情况.结果 观察组经评判性思维的健康教育后,焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分分别为(39.4±13.0)分、(42.5±14.3)分,均显著低于对照组的(51.3±13.9)分、(52.1±11.7)分,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);观察组护理满意优良率为99.17%,对照组护理满意优良率为89.00%,两组妇女护理满意优良率对比差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);观察组视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)和生活质量评分(QOL)分别为(1.9±0.8)分、(3.7±0.5)分,与对照组(4.9±1.0)分、(4.2±0.5)分相比,差异具有统计学意义(均P〈0.05).结论对剖宫产妇女进行评判性思维的健康教育,能够缓解抑郁、焦虑等不良情绪,有效改善妇女产后的生活质量,并进一步提高妇女的护理满意度,值得临床上进一步推广应用.

英文摘要:

Objective To discuss and analyze the influence of critical thinking to cesarean delivery women's health education and psychologic status. Methods A total of 1 200 cases of pregnant women with cesarean section in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 600 cases in each group. The women of observation group were treated with health education with critical thinking for treatment, while those of control group were treated with conventional health education. The effects of health educatio and psychologic status of two groups were compared and analyzed. Results After health education of critical thinking, the self-evaluation of anxiety scale (SAS) score and depression self rating scale (SDS) score of observation group were (39.4±13.0) scores and (42.5±14.3) scores, which were significantly lower than(51.3_±13.9) scores and (52.1±11.7) scores of control group. The differences had statistical significance (P〈0.05). The rate of good nursing satisfaction in the observation group and the control group were 99,17% and 89.00% respectively. And the comparison rate of good nursing satisfaction between the two groups had statistical significance (P〈0.05).The visual analog pain score (VAS) and quality of life scores (QOL) in the observation group were (1.9±0.8) scores and (3.7±0.5) scores, while those of control group were (4.9±1.0) scores and (4.2±0.5) scores. The difference of comparation between two groups was statistically significant (P all 〈 0.05). Conclusion Utilization of the health education with critical thinking in the cesarean delivery women can alleviate the adverse emotions, such as depression and anxiety. It can improve the postoperative quality of life effectively, and improve the nursing satisfaction of women. It is worth further clinical application.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《中国药理学通报》
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 主管单位:中国科学技术协会
  • 主办单位:中国药理学会
  • 主编:魏伟 李俊
  • 地址:合肥市梅山路81号安徽医科大学校内
  • 邮编:230032
  • 邮箱:huanghs8@163.com
  • 电话:0551-65161222 65169603 65161221
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1001-1978
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:34-1086/R
  • 邮发代号:26-52
  • 获奖情况:
  • 2003、2005年荣获国家期刊奖百种重点期刊奖,2006、2009、2010年被科技部中信所评为"百种中国...,2008年被中信所评为"中国精品科技期刊",2006-2008年获中国科协精品期刊工程项目资金资助,2009-2011年荣获中国科协精品期刊工程示范项目,2009、2011年获RCCSE中国"权威期刊"称号并名列药...
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 美国化学文摘(网络版),波兰哥白尼索引,荷兰文摘与引文数据库,荷兰医学文摘,美国生物科学数据库,日本日本科学技术振兴机构数据库,中国中国科技核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2004版),中国北大核心期刊(2008版),中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2014版),中国北大核心期刊(2000版)
  • 被引量:46533