中文摘要：

从本体论和认识论两个方面，克里普克论证了“巴黎的标准米尺”是一个先验偶然命题。以语词和世界的关系为切入点，张海澎驳斥了克里普克的先验偶然命题。陈波分析论证了克里普克所举证的命题都不是先验偶然命题的适当例证。龙小平深入分析了先验偶然命题成立的两条理由，对“巴黎标准尺是一米长”既不是偶然命题也不是先验命题的观点进行了反驳。刘叶涛分析了“巴黎米尺”在什么情况下是先验命题，并指出虽然“巴黎米尺”作为先验偶然命题的例证是不合适的，但是克里普克的先验偶然命题的观点仍然是正确的。

英文摘要：

From two aspects of ontology and epistemology, Kripke demonstrated that ＂the standard meter in Paris＂ is a contingent a prior proposition. With the relationship between the words and the world as the breakthrough point, Zhang Haipeng refuted kripke＇ s contingent a prior propositions. Chen Bo analyzed and demonstrated that Kripke proofed the propositions were not the appropriate examples of contingent a prior propositions. Long Xiaoping in-depth analyzed two reasons for contingent a prior propositions establishing, and retorted the view that ＂The standard meter in Paris is one meter long＂ is neither a contingent proposition nor a prior proposition. Liu Yetao analyzed ＂the standard meter in Paris＂ under what circumstances was a prior proposition, and pointed out that although ＂the standard meter in Paris＂ as an example of a contingent a pri- or proposition was inappropriate. KriDke＇s nersDective of contingent a Prior Dronositions are still correct.