位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
不同加减速控制算法的能耗分析与比较
  • 期刊名称:农业机械学报
  • 时间:0
  • 页码:193-197
  • 语言:中文
  • 分类:TP273[自动化与计算机技术—控制科学与工程;自动化与计算机技术—检测技术与自动化装置]
  • 作者机构:[1]江苏大学农业工程研究院,镇江212013
  • 相关基金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(50805067)和教育部重点实验室开放基金资助项目(NZ200704)
  • 相关项目:基于集成设计的果蔬精准采摘实现方法研究
中文摘要:

首先推导了理想加减速控制算法的最小能耗和梯形、二次样条曲线、S曲线、AS曲线加减速算法的速度函数,然后根据速度函数与电动机耗能之间的关系求出了各加减速控制算法的耗能函数,并通过Matlab编程求最小值,发现当梯形曲线的加速时间和二次样条曲线的加加速时间分别设为T/3和T/6;S曲线的加加速时间和匀加速时间分别设为0.01T和0.31T;AS曲线的加加速时间和匀加速时间分别设为0.01T和0.34T。减速段时间调节系数R2设为0.98时,能够分别获得加减速算法基于能量最优的速度轮廓。最后通过计算不同加减速算法在不同时间设置情况下的耗能,与最优速度轮廓的耗能比较。得出同一算法在不同时间参数设置时能耗差别明显,此外不同算法之间的能耗水平也有明显差别。

英文摘要:

The minimal energy dissipation of ideal velocity profile and the velocity function of general acc/dec algorithms were deduced. Subsequently, according to the relation between the velocity curve and the power dissipation in the motor, the energy dissipation function per step under the S-curve velocity was derived, and its minimum was solved with Matlab. It is a new discovery that the optimal velocity can be gained when tl of trapezoidal algorithm and quadric spline curve is T/3 and T/6 respectively; t1 and t2 of S-curve algorithm is 0.01T and 0.32T respectively; tl and t2 of AS-curve algorithm is 0.01 T and 0.35 T respectively, and R2 is 0.98. At last, the energy dissipation of acc/dec algorithms were calculated under the conditions of different time parameter settings, and were compared with the ideal velocity, more, there were obvious differences in energy dissipations of different algorithms. It is very useful to set the time parameters of acc/dec algorithms and improve the efficient of motor in acc/ dec motion control.

同期刊论文项目
期刊论文 11 会议论文 2 专利 2
同项目期刊论文