容错机制的提出有其理论、历史与现实的必然逻辑。近年来,围绕容错机制,中央层面不断进行政策倡导,各地也相继进行建制试行。深入分析现有的政策文本,在容错的目的、条件、程序、结果使用等问题上存在基本共识,但在宽严尺度把握、法理侧重程度以及粗细表述方式上也存在着不少分歧。针对这些共识和分歧,应该进一步厘清认识,在地方试行基础上适时推出全国性政策文本;同时要着眼实效,做好与容错机制相配套的防错纠错、激励督促、引导保障等文本建设。
The proposing of fault-tolerance mechanism had its logically inevitable theoretical, historical and practical roots. Our central government has been initiating policy advocacy on fault-tolerance mechanism and local governments have been issuing corresponding trial regulations over the last few years. A thorough textual analysis of such policies shows that we have reached some basic consensus on the objective, conditions, procedures, and applications of fault-tolerance mechanism. However, there are disagreements on the mechanism's scale grasping, legal emphasis degree, and means of expression. We need to put forward national policies based on local governments'trial experiences by making further clarifications on such consensus and disagreements. Furthermore, matching policies for fault-tolerance mechanism need to be drafted to ensure fault prevention and correction, motivation, supervision, guidance and efficacy.