中文摘要：

在分析农地整理建后管护基本内涵的基础上开发了农民满意度绩效量表，引入新制度经济学领域“结构-行为-绩效”（SCP）范式，构建农地整理建后管护的“组织结构-管护行为-管护绩效”的分析框架。以湖北省赤壁市黄盖湖农场和嘉鱼县潘家湾镇为研究区域开展实证研究，通过比率标度法和熵权法生成绩效测度的组合权重并得到满意度绩效，运用调查数据检验建后管护的组织结构和管护行为对管护绩效的影响机理，分析组织结构的工作职能、成长机制以及管护行为中的集体行为和个体行为的影响程度。研究结果显示：受访农民对农地整理的管护绩效评价接近于“一般”，企业管护模式下黄盖湖农场和集体管护模式下潘家湾镇的管护绩效存在显著的地区差异；表征管护组织持续发展状态、内部结构完善程度的组织结构类变量以及表征管护资金投入、受益农民群体参与程度的管护行为类变量是显著影响管护绩效的解释变量；黄盖湖农场企业化经营的组织结构、潘家湾镇的综合治理改革以及受到县级财政专项支持等外部要素是造成农地整理管护绩效差异的主要原因。研究结论验证了农地整理建后管护SCP分析框架的有效性，为提升农地整理管护绩效提供了理论依据。

英文摘要：

The behavior of supervision and maintenance was an importance guarantee for basic function of rural land consolidation. The essential implication for supervision and maintenance of rural land consolidation was discussed, as the premise of performance evaluation system development, from the view of peasants＇ satisfaction degree. Then Structure- Conduct-Performance paradigm was introduced from neo-institutional economics fields to help establish a theoretical framework of organization structure, public participation conduce, supervision and maintenance performance for rural land consolidation. The empirical study was carried out after the field investigation both in Huanggaihu Farm in Chibi and Panjiawan Town in Jiayu, Hubei Province. The results were calculated by satisfaction degree and index weight, which was a linear combination value by subjective weight and objective weight. Afterwards, the supposed logic relationship among organization structure, public participation conduce, supervision and maintenance performance were examined by using collected data to explore the former two factors＇ influence on the later one. The main study results were as follows. Performance value of supervision and maintenance of rural land consolidationwas near to middle level, and the difference between Huanggaihu and Panjiawan was statistical significant. For all samples, several variables were significant factors, such as sustainable and improvement of organization structure, finance funding, public participation, and so on. The regression equations also explained that the enterprise management of Huanggaihu Farm, the governance reform and finance support of Panjiawan, were the chief reason of performance difference between two districts. The study results verified the effectiveness of Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm, and were useful for performance improving.