位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
多水平随机中介效应估计及其比较
  • 期刊名称:心理学报
  • 时间:0
  • 页码:696-709
  • 语言:中文
  • 分类:B841[哲学宗教—基础心理学;哲学宗教—心理学]
  • 作者机构:[1]北京师范大学心理学院,北京100875, [2]云南师范大学学生处,昆明650092
  • 相关基金:国家自然科学基金项目(30870784)资助.
  • 相关项目:潜变量交互效应分析方法及其在心理学研究中的应用
中文摘要:

本文在综述各类多水平中介模型的基础上,聚焦于自变量、中介变量、因变量都来自多水平结构中较低水平的多水平随机中介效应模型,通过蒙特卡洛模拟研究比较该模型与简化的多水平固定中介效应模型、传统中介效应模型的差别,并考察了目前用于多水平随机中介效应的三种参数估计方法:限制性极大似然、极大似然、最小方差二次无偏估计在不同情况下对随机中介效应估计的优劣。研究结果显示:当数据符合多水平随机中介效应模型时,使用简化模型将错误估计中介效应及其标准误,得到不正确的统计检验结果;使用多水平随机中介效应模型能够实现对中介效应的正确估计和检验,其中限制性极大似然或极大似然估计方法优于最小方差二次无偏估计方法。

英文摘要:

The analysis of mediation effects is important in education, psychology, and other social sciences research. The approaches used in regression and path analysis for investigating such effects are widely known. These methods, however, are inappropriate if the data are clustered in nature, due to the violation of the assumption of independence of observations and biased standard errors. Therefore, a method for analyzing the mediation effects within multilevel models has been developed and proposed. Several procedures have been recommended and implemented in existing commercial software for testing of mediation effects in multilevel models. But most of these methods assumed that the effects are fixed, even for random indirect model. As a result, it is highly needed to examine the indirect effects under different conditions. There are few studies on this topic in Mainland till now. Following Bauer, Preacher, and Gil's (2006) study, the purpose of the present article focused on the multilevel random mediation effect model (1-1-1) and examined various analytical procedures for random multilevel meditation analysis. The performances of these procedures under different conditions were compared using Monte Carlo simulations method. First, in order to address why multilevel random mediation model is necessary, the improvement in using the random multilevel mediation model compared to two compact models, the multilevel fixed mediation model and the single-level traditional mediation model is examined. Second, three different estimation methods, restricted maximum likelihood estimate (REML), maximum likelihood estimate (MLE), and minimum variance quadratic unbiased estimate (MIVQUE) are compared in different conditions. The results indicate that we can obtain unbiased estimation of the mediation effect, correct standard error, and proper result of hypothesis test through using the multilevel random mediation model, comparing with using tke other two compact models. Moreover, the differences of multilev

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文