中文摘要：

我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》在部分涉外关系的法律适用方面要求选择＂有利于保护＂某一方当事人的实体法。这种规定虽然有体现冲突法实质正义追求的积极意义,但也为法院查明和准确适用外国法增加了难度,不利于司法任务的简单化。所谓＂有利的法＂,要求法院在众多可适用的法中,通过比较选择一个能最好保护一方当事人利益的实体法,这其实是美国＂最好的法＂选法方法的翻版。冲突法实质正义的趋向应当是有限度的,不应取代实体法所应发挥的作用,否则会破坏法律选择的稳定性和可预见性,丧失冲突法的规范价值和存在意义。鉴于该法生效时间不长,一时难以修改,可以考虑通过司法解释对之予以适当矫正。

英文摘要：

The Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of the People’s Republic of China enacted in 2010 requires application of the most beneficial substantive law in some foreign relationships. Though this may be positive to realize the trend of substantive justice of conflict of laws,it also adds obstacle for the court to ascertain and accurately apply foreign law,which is not beneficial for the simplification of judicial tasks. The beneficial law approach is a reproduction of American best law theory which requires judges to compare the different results of foreign substantive laws. We should bear in mind that the trend of substantive justice of conflict of laws should be limited in a scope and not replace the role of substantive law. Otherwise,conflict of laws will lose its stability and predictability and at last lose its value of rule. Considering that it has been enacted not long,the Supreme Court should rectify it by judicial interpretation at present.