中文摘要：

我国当前有关立法和司法实践所确立的被告住所地一般管辖规则和侵权行为地特殊管辖规则,可继续适用于网络侵权争议管辖权的确定,但在司法实践中因为没有充分认识到网络侵权争议案件的复杂性,将场所化理念与多元分析要素切实注入管辖权分析之中,特别是在立法上也缺乏有关诽谤等人格侵权与知识产权侵权管辖权行使的特殊规定。我国的涉外网络侵权管辖权的立法和司法实践,有待在矫正传统被告住所地和侵权行为地管辖规则的基础上,通过注入以合理预见、利益中心、关联争议集中管辖等分析要素进一步予以考察重构。因信息网络传播所引起的侵权争议,侵权行为地法院管辖权的行使,应确立在有关争议与受案法院地存在紧密联系的基础之上,除非没有其他行使管辖权的可能,受案法院不能仅以有关侵权行为发生在该地为受理案件的唯一根据。

英文摘要：

Though China contemporary legal and practice of jurisdiction frame composed of general jurisdiction debased on the defendant domicile and specific jurisdiction for tort debased on the place of tort can continue applicable to internet related tort disputes,due to the lack full realized the complex of dispute resolution of internet tort,the court practice does not put the localization analysis and multilateral analysis factors into the jurisdiction analysis process. Even more,there is no special jurisdiction rule in defamation and other injury to rights of personality and intellectual property,besides the traditional jurisdiction criteria of domicile and the place where the harmful event occurred should be adapted,the legal and court practice of China foreign related Internet tort jurisdiction system demands reconsideration and restatement be based on the major factors of reasonable analysis,interest focused and related actions under single procedure. While matters concerns Internet related tort,the jurisdiction of the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur,should be based on close contact between the seized court and the concerning dispute,unless there is the other accessible jurisdictional court,otherwise the harmful event occurred should not be taken as the only jurisdiction basis.