中文摘要：

传统的危机态主要是以产能危机为核心特质的危机形态；而现代的危机态则是以信用危机为核心特质的危机形态。这两种危机态在发生机制、传导机制等方面存在着本质上的差异，这使得经典的危机“中心-边缘”结构假说在解释此次美国金融危机时陷入了理论困惑，但两种危机态的“中心-边缘”危机转移规律是不变的。我国应当在世界金融体系不断解构与升级的进程中准确地定位，加强监管，防范风险，从金融制度、金融工具乃至产业发展等方面采取积极有效的策略加以应对。

英文摘要：

A traditional crisis usually demonstrates as a crisis in production capacity, but a modern crisis generally demonstrates as a credit crisis. There are fundamental differences in the generative mechanisms and transmission mechanisms of the two kinds of crises, which have made the classical ＂center-periphery＂ structural hypothesis invalid in explaining the current financial crisis in the US. However, the classical ＂center-periphery＂ crisis-transferring mechanism does not change in both kinds of crises. In the process of destructing and ever-escalating of the world financial system, China should locate itself appropriately such that it can strengthen regulation and prevent risks; specifically, China needs to cope with current situation with active and effective strategies in aspects such as financial institutions, financial tools, and industrial development.