中文摘要：

之前的相关研究表明相位锁定的脑电活动调节自我相关物主代词的认知加工。然而, 非相位锁定的神经震荡是否参与自我相关物主代词的加工目前还不清楚。为了考察非相位锁定的神经震荡在自我相关物主代词加工中的功能性意义, 我们要求被试完成一个标准/偏差刺激辨别任务, 同时记录其脑电活动。小波分析的结果发现相对于非自我相关物主代词“他的”, 自我相关物主代词“我的”引发了更大的theta频带（4~8 Hz）能量活动, 这表明theta波的活动对自我相关信息加工中脑的大范围神经同步形成的功能性神经网络起着一个很重要的作用。

英文摘要：

Numerous studies have demonstrated that there is a processing bias existing in the human brain toward self-related information rather than other-related information, such as one’s own face and name. Self-related information, due to its high social/adaptive value, seems to have a preferential access to our attentional resources （the cocktail party effect） and memory system （self-reference effect）. Electrophysiological studies confirmed this effect and found that self-relevant information induced enhanced ERP activations. However, in these studies on self, self-related information were adopted in concrete object. Previous event-related potential （ERP） studies showed that phase-locked electrophysiological activities mediate self-relevant possessive pronoun processing relative to non-self-relevant possessive pronoun “his”, self-relevant possessive pronoun “my” elicited a signi？cantly increased P300 amplitude. It means that even if separated from the specific object, abstract self-relevant possessive pronouns also obtained an advantage processing. However, whether non-phase-locked neural oscillations are involved in self-relevant possessive pronoun remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the functional role of non-phase-locked neural oscillations in encoding self-relevant possessive pronoun. The experiment was adopted a three-stimulus oddball paradigm. The experimental materials include four categories, big circle, small circle, and two types of possessive pronouns （“my”, “his”）. The big circle was served as standard stimulus （80%）, the small circle was served as target stimulus （10%） and two categories of possessive pronouns （“my” （5%）, “his” （5%）） distractors. The task of the participants was to observe the stimuli carefully and make behavioral response to the small circle. Twenty healthy students participated in this experiment. The electroencephalogram （EEG） was continuously recorded from scalp electrodes using the 256-channel Hyd