目的 研究维持性血透(maintenanceheamodialysis,MHD)患者血清N末端B型钠尿肽原(NT—probrainnatriureticpeptide,NT—proBNP)水平与干体重的关系,寻找有效的评价干体重的方法。方法分别测定18例干体重控制良好(干体重达标组)MHD患者和20例干体重控制不良MHD患者(干体重未达标组)血清NT—proBNP,测定干体重未达标组患者经过4周下调干体重治疗前后的血清NT—proBNP的水平,记录各患者临床、生化数据及心功能阶段分级fACC/AHA)。结果所有MHD患者血清NT—proBNP水平高于临床诊断值3419.3(2368.7—5728.3)pg/ml。干体重达标组的血清NT—proBNP水平2872.4(1907.3~3655.9)pg/ml,干体重未达标组的血清NT—proBNP水平4568.4(3236.3~6530.4)pg/ml,两组数据比较有统计学意义(P〈0.01);干体重未达标组治疗前后血清NT—proBNP水平中位数(4568.4vs2569.Opg/m1)明显下降,有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论血清NT—oroBNP水平能反映MHD的干体重,可作为干体重评估的简单、有效方法。
Objective To investigate the relationship between plasma NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and dry weight in patients in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and to evaluate the clinical value of NT-proBNP in the assessment of dry weight. Methods NT-proBNP level was determined in 18 cases of MHD patients with well-controlled dry weight and 20 cases of MHD patients with bad-controlled dry weight, while the latter would be checked once again after the weight was down-regulated to dry weight in 4 weeks. Results The average level of NT-proBNP was 3419.3(2368.7-5728.3 ) pg/ml which was higher than normal. Plasma NT-proBNP levels were significantly lower in patients with well-controlled dry weight than those patients with bad-controlled dry weight (2872.4 vs 4568.4) pg/ml, and there was very significant difference in plasma NT-proBNP levels between pre and post treatment of down-regulation to dry weight in patients with bad-controlled dry weight (4568.4 vs 2569.0) pg/ml. Conclusions Plasma NT-proBNP can be a good marker for the evaluation of dry weight in MHD patients.