对象解释和代人解释是关于经典逻辑量词的两种不同解释理论,二者的取舍曾引起学界长期的争论,迄今仍莫衷一是而陷入困境。“逻辑行动主义方法论”严格界划了语言域、思想域与对象域,并以行动论的视角阐释了它们的关联机理。以这一方法论为分析工具,可以清楚地显示以往困境的症结所在,并可通过对两种解释理论的一种共同预设的修订,提出一种新型的“外延一指称解释”。这种新的解释克服了对象解释与代入解释的缺陷,又保留了它们的优点。
Objectual interpretation and substitutional interpretation are two approaches to interpre- ting quantifiers in the classical first-order logic, but there have long been controversies over which one is better. The methodology of Logical Actionism distinguishes the realms of language, thought and reality strictly, and explains the inter connection among them from the perspective of action theory. As an analytic tool, this methodology reveals the causes of the previous dilemma, and proposes the new "Extension-Reference" interpretation, which revises the common presupposition of the two theo- ries and has better interpretive advantages.