中文摘要：

为探讨不同根区交替滴灌供水模式对赤霞珠葡萄幼苗生长的影响,筛选出适合中国干旱区酿酒葡萄生产的最佳滴灌供水模式和方法。该研究以酿酒葡萄品种赤霞珠（Vitis vinifera L.‘Cabernet Sauvignon’）为试验材料,分别测定左侧地下穴贮滴灌,右侧地表滴灌（SDI-DI）、两侧地下穴贮滴灌（SDI-SDI）、左侧地表滴灌,右侧地下穴贮滴灌（DI-SDI）、两侧地表滴灌（DI-DI）4种根区交替滴灌处理对赤霞珠葡萄幼苗根冠生物量、根系分布、根系活力及叶片生理功能的影响。结果表明：同一灌水条件下SDI-SDI、DI-SDI、SDI-DI能保持根冠比在较适宜水平（1-1.3）,DI-DI所受胁迫较大,根冠比增加,植株正常生长受到限制;根系水平分布上DI-SDI与SDI-DI根区左侧与根区右侧根量指标差异较大,DI-DI与SDI-SDI根区左右两侧根量指标差异较小,其中DI-SDI根区右侧根量指标分别比根区左侧高13.3%、10.5%、14.0%、22.1%;根系垂直分布上一侧为SDI的根区交替滴灌能促进根系下扎,提高土层深度20-60 cm处根系的根系活力,其中根区右侧SDI-SDI与DI-SDI处理根表面积、根体积在土层深度〉20-40 cm处分布最多,根表面积分别占右侧根总表面积的48.8%、49.2%,根体积分别占右侧根总体积的47.5%、46.3%;灌水量一定的条件下,灌水侧为SDI的根区交替滴灌能有效维持同一灌水周期内地上部叶片光合性能的稳定,保持叶片瞬时水分利用效率在较高水平,适宜降低表层根量增加深层根量可提高植株叶片的净光合速率和蒸腾速率。综合生产成本、田间实际操作与植株根冠生长差异,该试验条件下采用一侧地表滴灌、一侧地下穴贮滴灌的根区交替滴灌供水模式为最佳处理。

英文摘要：

On the basis of its own subsurface drip irrigation with tank system, effects of alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation on grape seedling growth were explored, and the best drip irrigation mode and method was selected that was suitable for wine grape production in arid and semiarid areas of China. The experiment used Vitis vinifera L.‘Cabernet Sauvignon＇ as materials and used conventional drip irrigation（DI） and subsurface drip irrigation with tank system（SDI）（independent design） as the basis of engineering technology.Under bag control experimental condition, four kinds of partial-root zone alternative controlled drip irrigation methods were designed as follows： SDI-DI（SDI was on the left side, DI was on the right side） SDI-SDI（both sides were SDI）, DI-SDI（DI was on the left side, SDI was on the right side）, DI-DI（both sides were DI）.Effects of alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation on shoot biomass, root distribution, root vigor and leaf physiological function of Cabernet Sauvignon seedling were discussed. The ratio of root to shoot was at optimum level（1-1.3） and shoot biomass accumulation were not significantly affected by SDI-SDI、DI-SDI、DI-SDI under the same irrigation conditions. The ratio of root and shoot was increased, plant experienced drought stress more intense and plant growth was limited by DI-DI. Horizontal root number on the left and right of DI-SDI and SDI-DI had great differences, and root number on the right was 13.3%、10.5%、14.0%、22.1% more than that on the left,while horizontal root number on both sides of DI-DI and SDI-SDI had small differences. Root penetration was promoted and root activity in the depth of soil layer 20-60 cm was improved by SDI-DI and DI-SDI. In the depth of soil layer 0-20 cm,Root average diameter on the left side of SDI-DI and SDI-SDI were significantly higher than that of DI-DI and DI-SDI, and root surface area, root volume on the left side of SDI-DI and SDI-SDI were lower than DI-DI and DI-SDI treatment. In the de