位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
联盟公平的工具效应及其对合作绩效的影响——被中介的调节效应研究
  • ISSN号:1008-3448
  • 期刊名称:《南开管理评论》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:F124.7[经济管理—世界经济]
  • 作者机构:[1]西北政法大学商学院, [2]西安交通大学管理学院
  • 相关基金:国家自然科学基金项目(71272134);高等学校全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金(201280)资助
中文摘要:

本文基于工具范式,探讨了联盟程序公平作为评估和提升分配公平的工具效应,以及分配公平在程序公平与合作绩效之间的中介作用,提出契约执行与共享愿景对程序公平与合作绩效之间关系的调节效应是被分配公平中介的调节效应。基于205家企业的双份数据(Two Key Informants)进行检验,结果证实了程序公平对分配公平的提升效应,以及分配公平在程序公平与合作绩效之间的部分中介作用。此外,契约执行会负向调节程序公平与分配公平之间的关系,契约执行对程序公平与合作绩效之间的负向调节效应部分通过了分配公平中介作用的传递;共享愿景正向调节程序公平与分配公平之间的关系,但是共享愿景对程序公平与合作绩效之间的关系没有产生直接的调节效应,从而共享愿景对程序公平的调节效应也不会通过分配公平的中介作用影响合作绩效。

英文摘要:

In recent years, research on alliance justices has typically focused on the independent and interactive roles of procedural justice and distributive justice in strategic alliance. Drawing on the instrumentality paradigm, we discuss that procedural justice is instrumental in evaluating and improving distributive justice, thus a mediating role of distributive justice should exist between procedural justice and alliance performance. Furthermore, alliance justice researchers have regarded procedural justice and distributive justice as formal structural elements in alliance,and suggested that the impacts of justices on alliance performance are contingent on formal and informal alliance governance mechanisms. However, little work has examined the moderating impacts of governance mechanisms on the relationships between justices and alliance performance, and whether distributive justice mediates the moderating effects of governance mechanisms in the relationship between procedural justice and alliance performance is not discerned yet. Based on justice theory and alliance governance research, this study distinguishes the moderating role of formal contract application from the moderating role of informal shared vision,and proposes that distributive justice mediates the moderating effects of contract application and shared vision in the relationship between procedural justice and alliance performance. Results from 205 Chinese firms show that:(1) procedural justice has positive effect on distributive justice, and distributive justice partially mediates the relationship between procedural justice and alliance performance;(2) contract application negatively moderates the positive relationship between procedural justice and distributive justice, and distributive justice partially mediates the moderating effect of contract application in the relationship between procedural justice and alliance performance; and(3) shared vision positively moderates the positive relationship between procedural justice and distributiv

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《南开管理评论》
  • 北大核心期刊(2011版)
  • 主管单位:国家教育部
  • 主办单位:南开大学商学院
  • 主编:李维安
  • 地址:天津市南开区卫津路94号南开大学商学院
  • 邮编:300071
  • 邮箱:
  • 电话:022-23505995 23498167
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1008-3448
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:12-1288/F
  • 邮发代号:6-130
  • 获奖情况:
  • 天津市第八届优秀期刊评选特别荣誉奖,第二届北方十佳期刊
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 中国中国人文社科核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2008版),中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2014版),中国社科基金资助期刊,中国国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库
  • 被引量:26296