葛兰西并未提出过意识形态话语权概念,但其文化领导权思想实际透露出“意识形态”通过“话语”取得“权力”的逻辑:借助范式的分析方法,其思想得以从历史主义进入结构主义,展现出一个具有宏观话语权生态、中观话语权框架和微观话语权实践的立体图示。廓清与葛兰西思想的异质性,并以共时、历时和即时三个维度建构主导意识形态话语权,这是当代中国从葛兰西话语权范式获得的启示。
Although Gramsci had never proposed the concept of "ideological discourse", the concept "hegemony" had revealed the logic that the ideology is getting power from discourse. By using the paradigm analysis method, Gramsci's ideas could go from historicism to structuralism, and have showed a dimensional view composed by macro discourse ecology, medium discourse framework and micro discourse practice. Clarifying the heterogeneity between Gramsci's ideas and the discourse problems in contemporary China, and then constructing the dominant ideological discoorse in the dimensions of synchrony, diachrony and immediacy, that is what should be learnt from the former enlightenment discourse paradigm.