位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
A Comparison of Carlin-type Gold Deposits:Guizhou Province,Golden Triangle,Southwest China,and Northern Nevada,USA
  • ISSN号:1005-2321
  • 期刊名称:《地学前缘》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:P618.130.2[天文地球—矿床学;天文地球—地质学]
  • 作者机构:[1]University of Nevada Las Vegas, [2]Nevada BareaH of Mines and Geology and University of Nevada Reno, [3]School of Earth Sciences and Resources,China University of Geosiences(Beijing), [4]State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry.Institute of Geochemistry.Chinese Academy of Sciemces
  • 相关基金:Acknowledgements We would like to thank and acknowledge all of the individuals at the Shuiyindong, Zimudang, Taipingdong, Yata and Jinfeng deposits for access to the deposits and drill core for sampling, excellent mine tours, and wonderful hospitality during our vis it. We would also like to acknowledge financial support from Key Project 40930423 from the National Natural Science Foun dation of China.
中文摘要:

Several Au deposits in Guizhou Province,southwest China,described as being similar to the highly productive Carlin-type gold deposits in northern Nevada.USA,were examined to identify similarities and differences between the two districts.Samples were collected along transects from lowto high-grade rock,where possible,and fram stockpiles at the Shuiyindong,Zimudang,Taipingdong,Yata and Jinfeng(formerly Lannigou)deposits.Methods used to examine ore and alteration minerals included hand-sample description:reflectance spectroscopy using an ASD Terraspec spectrometer;analyses of hand samples by carbonate staining with Alizaren red and potassium ferricyanide;transmitted and reflected light petrography;chemical analyses,mineral identification,and imaging using a JEOL.JSM-5610 scanning electron microscope:and quantitative chemical analyses using a JEOL JXA-8900 electron probe microanalyzer.Geochemical analyses of hand samples for 52 elements were done by ALS Chemex.Results indicate both similarities and differences between the two districts.Both districts have similar geologic histories.and deposits at both locations appear to have formed as a result of similar tectonic events.though the district in southwest China lacks evidence of eoeval felsic igneous activity;however,the ore-stage minerals and the fluids that produced the minerals and deposits have some significant differences.The Nevada deposits were dominated by fluid-rock reaction in which host rock Fe was sulfidized to form Au-bearing pyrite.Although ore fluids sulfidized host rock Fe in the Cuizhou deposits.the timing of Fe metasomatism is unknown,so whether the deposits formed in response to sulfidation or pyritization is unclear.Fluid-rock reaction between an acidic,aqueous fluid and highly reactive calcareous rocks in Nevada caused extensive decarbonatization of host rocks,jasperoid replacemerit of carbonate minerals,and alteration of silty rock components to illite and kaolinite.In Guizhou,CO2-bearing ore fluids with temperatures and pressures approaching 10

英文摘要:

Several Au deposits in Guizhou Province,southwest China,described as being similar to the highly productive Carlin-type gold deposits in northern Nevada.USA,were examined to identify similarities and differences between the two districts.Samples were collected along transects from lowto high-grade rock,where possible,and fram stockpiles at the Shuiyindong,Zimudang,Taipingdong,Yata and Jinfeng(formerly Lannigou)deposits.Methods used to examine ore and alteration minerals included hand-sample description:reflectance spectroscopy using an ASD Terraspec spectrometer;analyses of hand samples by carbonate staining with Alizaren red and potassium ferricyanide;transmitted and reflected light petrography;chemical analyses,mineral identification,and imaging using a JEOL.JSM-5610 scanning electron microscope:and quantitative chemical analyses using a JEOL JXA-8900 electron probe microanalyzer.Geochemical analyses of hand samples for 52 elements were done by ALS Chemex.Results indicate both similarities and differences between the two districts.Both districts have similar geologic histories.and deposits at both locations appear to have formed as a result of similar tectonic events.though the district in southwest China lacks evidence of eoeval felsic igneous activity;however,the ore-stage minerals and the fluids that produced the minerals and deposits have some significant differences.The Nevada deposits were dominated by fluid-rock reaction in which host rock Fe was sulfidized to form Au-bearing pyrite.Although ore fluids sulfidized host rock Fe in the Cuizhou deposits.the timing of Fe metasomatism is unknown,so whether the deposits formed in response to sulfidation or pyritization is unclear.Fluid-rock reaction between an acidic,aqueous fluid and highly reactive calcareous rocks in Nevada caused extensive decarbonatization of host rocks,jasperoid replacemerit of carbonate minerals,and alteration of silty rock components to illite and kaolinite.In Guizhou,CO2-bearing ore fluids with temperatures and pressures approa

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《地学前缘》
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 主管单位:教育部
  • 主办单位:中国地质大学(北京) 北京大学
  • 主编:王成善
  • 地址:北京市学院路29号
  • 邮编:100083
  • 邮箱:frontier@cugb.edu.cn
  • 电话:010-82322973
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1005-2321
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:11-3370/P
  • 邮发代号:
  • 获奖情况:
  • 荣获第五、六届"百种中国杰出学术期刊","首届中国高校精品科技期刊"称号
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 俄罗斯文摘杂志,美国化学文摘(网络版),荷兰文摘与引文数据库,美国工程索引,美国地质文献预评数据库,英国动物学记录,日本日本科学技术振兴机构数据库,中国中国科技核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2004版),中国北大核心期刊(2008版),中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2014版)
  • 被引量:34961