ObjectiveTo 在 Hanghzou 在城市的社区住所成年人估计测试网可靠性和国际物理活动问询表长形式( IPAQ-L )的简化汉字的版本的标准有效性,从在 Hangzhou 的二个中央区域的 6 位邻居的 25-59 年的 158 个合格参加者全部的 China.MethodsA 在7天的间隔以内完成了 IPAQ-L 问询表两次。这些题目的一半在开始的 7 天期间穿了计步器。测试网可靠性被比较检验第一(白天 1 ) 并且第二(白天 9 ) IPAQ-L 的调查。标准有效性被把 IPAQ-L 与计步器 data.ResultsModest 作比较到可靠性为全部的 PA 与 0.67 的 intraclass 关联系数被发现的好测试网估计, 0.37 ~ 0.73 为特定的尺寸,并且 0.56 ~ 0.71 为 PA 的不同紧张。 IPAQ-L 测量的全部的 PA 中等与锻练层次被相关(部分 r = 0.27 , P = 0.020 )并且走的距离(部分 r = 0.31 , P = 0.007 ),它被一个计步器测量在为性调整以后,变老,教育成就和雇用 status.ConclusionOur 结果显示 IPAQ-L 是一项可靠、验证的措施因为估计物理活动在另外的大陆汉语城市里在这张人口并且可能铺平成年人口。
Objective To assess the test-retest reliability and criterion validity of the Simplified Chinese-character version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Long form (IPAC).-L) in urban community-dwelling adults in Hanghzou, China. Methods A total of 158 eligible participants aged 25-59 years from 6 neighbourhoods in two central districts of Hangzhou completed the IPAQ-L questionnaire twice within a 7-day interval. Half of the subjects wore pedometers during the first 7 days. Test-retest reliability was examined by comparing the first (Day 1) and the second (Day 9) survey of IPAQ-L Criterion validity was assessed by comparing IPAO,-L with pedometer data. Results Modest to good test-retest reliability was found with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.67 for total PA, 0.37 to 0.73 for specific dimensions, and 0.56 to 0.71 for different intensities of PA. Total PA measured by IPAO.-L was moderately correlated with exercise levels (partial r = 0.27, P = 0.020) and walking distance (partial r = 0.31, P = 0.007), which were measured by a pedometer, after adjusting for gender, age, educational attainment and employment status. Conclusion Our results indicate that the IPAO.-L is a reliable and validated measure for assessing physica activity levels in this population and possibly the adult population in other mainland Chinese cities.