中文摘要：

目的制备负载油性超顺磁性氧化铁（SPIO）、水性SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡，并观察负载油性SPIO、水性SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡对结肠癌的MR显像能力。方法通过多步化学反应制备聚乙二醇-聚D，L-丙交酯（PEG—PDLLA）纳米囊泡，并分别负载油性、水性SPIO。18只荷结肠癌裸鼠模型采用数字表法随机分为3组，每组6只，分别从尾静脉注射单纯SPIO水溶液、负载油性SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡和水性SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡，行MRI动态扫描观察肿瘤、肝脏、肌肉的T2WI信号和T2值。采用重复测量设计的方差分析比较3组间肿瘤、肝脏、肌肉的T2WI信号强度改变，两两比较采用Bonferroni法。结果静脉注射负载油性、水性SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡后引起肿瘤T2WI信号强度下降，两者引起肿瘤信号强度下降最大百分比分别为11．00％、11．40％；单纯SPIO水溶液未能引起肿瘤信号强度下降，3组间比较差异有统计学意义（F=10．96，P〈0．01），负载油性、水性SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡引起的信号强度下降比单纯SPIO水溶液明显（P〈0．05）；而负载油性和水性SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡间的差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。3种对比剂均引起肝脏T2WI信号强度下降，单纯SPIO水溶液、负载油性、水性SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡引起肝脏信号强度下降的最大百分比分别为32．85％、52．77％、56．89％，3组间比较差异有统计学意义（F=161．18，P〈0．01），负载油性、水性SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡引起的信号强度下降比单纯SPIO水溶液明显（P〈0．01）；负载水性SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡比负载油性SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡引起的信号强度下降更明显（P〈0．01）。3种对比剂均未引起肌肉组织的T2WI信号强度下降，测量各组间肌肉的信号强度改变的差异无统计学意义（F=0．59，P〉0．05）。结论负载SPIO聚合物纳米囊泡在体内可以引起肿瘤的L2I信号强度?

英文摘要：

Objective To synthesize the hydrophobic supraparamagnetic ironic oxide（SPIO） loaded and hydrophilic SPIO loaded polymeric nano-vesicles and to investigate the feasibility of using hydrophobic SPIO loaded and hydrophilic SPIO loaded polymeric nano-vesicles to display the tumor in MRI in vivo through animal experiments. Methods The polymeric nano-vesicles were prepared from poly （D, L-lactic acid） （PDLLA） and poly （ethylene glycol） （PEG） by a muhiple emulsion/solvent evaporation method. The hydrophobic SPIO and hydrophilic SPIO were loaded in the polymeric nano-vesieles respectively. Eighteen nude mice models with human eoloreetal carcinoma xenograft were established. They were divided equally into three groups （n = 6 ）. The three groups of nude mice models were injected with water-soluble SPIO, hydrophobic SPIO loaded and hydrophilie SPIO loaded vesicle via the mice caudal vein respectively. Dynamic MRI scan were performed in all the mice models. T2WI signal intensity and T2 relaxation time were measured in the tumor, liver and muscle by using T2 mapping software. ANOVA of repeated measurement was used to analyze if there were significant differences of signal intensity changes among the three groups, while Bonferroni method was used for pair-wise comparison. Results On T2 WI, tumors showed decrease in signal intensity ＇after hydrophobic or hydrophilic SPIO loaded polymeric nano-vesicle injection, while no signal intensity decrease was found in the tumor after water-soluble SPIO administration. The maximum percentage of signal intensity decrease in tumor caused by hydrophobic SPIO loaded and hydrophilic SPIO loaded vesicle were 11.00% , 1 1.40% , respectively. There was statistical significant difference of signal intensity changes among these three groups （ F = 10. 96, P 〈 0. 01 ）. The decrease in signal intensity in the groups with hydrophilic or hydrophobic SPIO loaded polymeric nano-vesicles injection were more pronounced as compared with that of water-soluble SPIO （ P 〈 0.