中文摘要：

生态系统提供的生态服务与城市系统提供的城市服务共同塑造了系统的适宜性,共同支撑了社会经济的健康发展。在传统的适宜性评价体系中并未明确两种服务间的差异与联系,导致规划实践与政策制定中仍存在不科学、不合理的现象。同时,评价中专家、决策者等“自上而下”的意见占主导,对利益相关者“自下而上”的看法考虑不充分,规划、决策与现实操作间容易脱节。在明确生态服务、城市服务的内涵基础上,辨析两者间的差异与联系,构建LAM模型,为决策者提供一个较为通用的评估方法。

英文摘要：

Ecological services provided by ecosystems, urban services provided by urban systems, shaped the livability and supported the healthy development of social economy commonly. Traditional livability assessment system did not clearly identify the difference and contact between the two services, resulting the unscientific and unreasonable phenomenon still existed in the planning practices and policy - making. Meanwhile, in the tradi- tional livability assessment model, the ＂top- down＂ adviees of policy- makers and experts were in a dominant position, while for the ＂bottom- up＂ views of insightful stakeholders were always considered insufficiently. The connection between planning, decision - making and actual operation was easily out of touch. Based on a clear content of ecological services and urban services, this paper discriminated the difference between both contacts, through identifying the ＂type of service＂ in the livability assessment system, introducing insightful multi- stakeholder involved in the evaluation and using rite multi- criteria decision analysis to construct livability assessment model （LAM）.