论文探讨了20世纪30年代初的难侨问题及特点、侨乐村的筹办与运作模式、侨乐村推广之困境等问题;对侨乐村与华侨农场这两种难侨安置模式进行了比较分析。面对30年代初出现的大批难侨问题,以往常规的救助政策已经不能应对新情况。南京国民政府试图通过建立、推广侨乐村,从根本上实现对归国难侨的救济。侨乐村的创办具有救助难侨、开垦荒地繁荣经济的双重目的,然而在实际管理、运行中,却过度注重国家利益而忽视垦民诉求;加之其他外部环境的影响,侨乐村最终未能得到广泛推广。但通过垦荒安置难民的思路和举措被社会各界认同。侨乐村模式对抗战时期难侨、难民救助及后世华侨农场的建设都有着重要意义。
In the early 1930s,due to the worldwide Great Depression and the resulting anti-Chinese sentiment in their host countries,a significant number of overseas Chinese were repatriated to China. In order to help these overseas Chinese refugees,the ROC government in Nanjing set up a pioneer resettlement called Qiaole Village in Xuancheng,Anhui province,for 82 single overseas Chinese refugees and encouraged them to reclaim surrounding wastelands.The author of this article relates this experiment and compares it with the Huaqiao Nongchang( overseas Chinese farms) which were widely set up by the PRC government in Beijing to place overseas Chinese refuges during the 1950s and the 1960s.