中文摘要：

一直以来,理论界将＂诗言志＂与＂诗缘情＂对立起来,从而形成文论发展的两个不同流派,似乎两者之间存在着某种不可互渗互补的矛盾性。事实上,理论界长期流行的这种＂矛盾＂说法有失偏颇。在中国文论发展史上,这两种说法不仅在文本来源上造就了一种虚假的矛盾性,而且在以＂情＂为本体的观念上也分化了两者的交叠重合,而＂诗言志＂与＂诗缘情＂矛盾的真正根源在于儒道观念的差异。

英文摘要：

All along, the theorists of ＂The poem speaking out the poet＇s ideal ＂and ＂poem indicating emotion＂ against each other, and become the text on the development of two different schools, seems to exist between a certain non-Infiltration com-plementary contradictions. In fact the popular theory of this long period of ＂contradictory＇statement is biased, not the real con-tradiction between the two lies. In the history of Chinese literary theory, these two broad view, not only in the source text cre-ated on a false conflict, but also in the ＂emotion ＂ for the body is also divided on the concept of overlap, and ＂ The poem speak- ing out the poet＇s ideal ＂and＂poem indicating emotion＂ the real conflict is rooted in ＂Confucianists＂and ＂Daoist＂ values of the differences.