位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
中文简化版PAD情绪量表在京大学生中的初步试用
  • 期刊名称:中国心理卫生杂志, 22(5):2008,pp.327-329.
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学;哲学宗教—心理学] B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学;哲学宗教—心理学]
  • 作者机构:[1]中国科学院心理研究所,脑与认知科学国家重点实验室,北京100101, [2]湖南师范大学心理学系,长沙410081, [3]桂林电子科技大学,桂林541004
  • 相关基金:中国科技部973项目(2006CB303101)和国家自然科学基金重点项目(60433030)支持.
  • 相关项目:情感计算理论与方法研究
中文摘要:

目的:考察中文简化版PAD情绪量表在中国大学生群体中的适用性。方法:选取北京地区1000名大学本科生为被试,采用信度分析、项目分析和验证性因素分析考察量表的内部一致性信度和结构效度。结果:愉悦度、激活度和优势度的内部一致性信度分别为0.85、0.58和0.72;各项目与其所属维度的相关介于0.641-0.872之间(P〈0.01);三因子模型的验证性因素分析的各项拟合指数为,χ^2/df=50.46,RMSEA=0.079,NNFI=0.90,NFI=0.92,CFI=0.93,GFI=0.95。结论:愉悦度和优势度的内部一致性信度较高,激活度的内部一致性信度较低;量表具有较好的结构效度。

英文摘要:

Objective: To explore the applicability of the Abbreviated PAD Emotion Scale for Chinese undergraduates. Methods: 1000 undergraduates in Beijing were examined with the Abbreviated PAD Emotion Scales, and the reliability and construct validity were evaluated by inter-item consistency analysis, item analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The inter-item consistency (Cronbach's α) for P (pleasure), A (arousal), and D (dominance) were 0. 85, 0. 58 and 0. 72 respectively; the correlations between items and the dimensions they belong to ranged between 0. 64 and 0. 87 ( P 〈 0. 01) ; the fit indices of the three-factor model by confirmatory factor analysis were all above 0. 90. Conclusions : The inter-item consistency ( Cronbach's α ) for P and D were good enough; the scales had good construct validity for Chinese undergraduates.

同期刊论文项目
期刊论文 80 会议论文 76 获奖 1 著作 8
同项目期刊论文