中文摘要：

目的：分析不同背景的专家对于公立医疗机构公益性评价的共识和存在的分歧。方法：对大学科研机构研究者、卫生行政部门管理者、医院管理者和社会团体与患者代表共29名专家进行咨询。结果：不同类型专家对于公益性是公平可及优先还是质量优先存在争议,对于少数二级指标的权重选择也存在不同意见。结论：减少和消除政府、公立医疗机构以及患者对于公益性的认识差异,并明确各方责任有助于公立医疗机构公益性的提高和改善。

英文摘要：

Objective：To analyze consensus and differences of evaluating public interest of public medical institutions from the point of view of the consultants who are in various backgrounds. Methods：Consulting to 29 experts including researchers from universities and research institutions, health officials, public hospital administrators and social groups representative and patients. Result：Different experts hold different opinions on giving priority to fairness and accessibility or quality priority when evaluating public interest of public medical institutions, there are also different views by few conclutants on secondary indicators weight. Conclusion：Improving and enhancing public interest of public medical institutions lies on reducing and eliminating the cognitive differences of public interest within government, public medical institutions and patients, as well as ensuring responsibilities of the parties.