中文摘要：

法律叙事学对于裁判事实认定的意义，并不在于通过虚构否定真实，而在于让裁判中的叙事摆脱逻辑的遮蔽，揭示叙事在事实认定中的作用机理。在法律叙事学的视野下，确信真实是裁判事实认定的目标；裁判事实认定的过程是一个法内叙事和法外叙事相互交织、相互作用的过程；裁判事实的认定过程是围绕事件、通过语言活动展开的建构过程，挑选、添加、诠释等叙事策略贯穿于这一语言的建构活动之中。

英文摘要：

The significance of legal narratology means of fiction, but in the removal of logical in the finding of judicial fact lies not in the denial of fact by shadow from the judged narrative so as to expose the working mechanism of narrative in the fact finding. Under the perspective of legal narratology, the truth conviction is the aim of judicial fact finding. The process of judicial fact finding involves interweaving and interacting of the narrative in law and out of law, which centers on the event and starts to be constructed by language activities. Hence the narrative strategies such as selection, addition and interpretation and so on run through the activity of language construction.