中文摘要：

刑法主客观主义的争论焦点是主客观不法论,后者以法益侵害危险即＂危险结果＂为不法成立的标准。行为无价值论否认＂危险结果＂的意义,必然背离客观主义。在客观主义视野中,＂危险结果＂从未被看作＂客观实在之物＂,它是指＂行为对法益造成侵害的可能性或盖然性＂,乃行为危险与结果危险的统一。对＂危险结果＂的判断是以外部客观事实为判断资料的事后判断,完全可以脱离行为人的主观犯意来考察。与刑法主观主义相比,＂危险结果＂使客观主义的不法判断更客观、不法成立时点更后置,更能够为刑罚干预权设限。

英文摘要：

The controversy between criminal objectivism and criminal subjectivism is the objective invalidity and subjective invalidity. The criminal objectivism regards the danger to legal interest as the invalidity criteria,which stands for ＂the danger as a result＂. But ＂the danger as a result＂is never been treated as objective reality and it refers to the probability of damage to legal interest. The ＂danger as a result＂is a unification of act and result. The judgment of ＂danger as a result＂is a postmortem judgment which is based on the objective facts and divorced from subjective dolus. Therefore,comparing with criminal subjectivism,＂the danger as a result＂can make the invalidity judgment more objective and make the invalidity time point much later. All these will set limits to the criminal power.