中文摘要：

当下我国刑法应对日益严重的网络犯罪,采取的主要手段是通过＂探究社会秩序的客观精神＂以谋求对＂社会现实的客观评价＂,在所有刑法解释方法中,刑法客观解释轻易获得了优位权。然而,法律的形式主义与概念主义传统固然有其缺陷不能否定,以扩张为导向的刑法客观解释导致＂客观解释等同于扩张解释＂,形成了网络时代刑法网络治理的入罪化,并造成法律公权力对技术性网络空间自由的伤害,对网络时代公民自由权利的忽视。针对网络空间层出不穷的新型违法犯罪行为,应警惕客观解释论的过度使用;结合主观解释论的法治基因优势,宜以＂主观的客观解释论＂重新塑造网络时代刑法的客观解释论,即在网络犯罪的解释适用中,以客观解释为基础,同时其解释不能超出＂刑法条文的语言原意＂之范围,以主观解释作为客观解释之限定。

英文摘要：

At present, the main means adopted by our criminal law to deal with the increasingly serious cyber crime is achieving the ＂ objective evaluation of social reality＂ through ＂ exploring the objective spirit of social order＂. In all the methods of interpretation of criminal law, the objective interpretation of criminal law is easily given priority. Although the legal formalism and legal conceptual traditions are flawed, they cannot be denied. The objective interpretation of the expansion - oriented criminal law leads to the phenomenon of ＂objective interpretation is equivalent to the expansion of interpretation＂. It causes the criminalization of the criminal law to the network governance in the Internet age, leads to the damage of public power to freedom of technical cyberspace, and brings about the neglect of civil liberties in the Internet age. For more and more new types of illegal and criminal activities occurred in cyberspace, we should guard the excessive use of objective interpretation theory ; We should combine the advantages of subjective interpretation theory to reshape the objective interpretation of criminal law by ＂subjective objective interpretation theory＂ in the Internet age. That is, in the interpretation and application of cyber crime, we should be based on the objective interpretation, while the objective interpretation of the conclusion cannot exceed the ＂original meaning of the text＂ range, and the subjective interpretation is used to define objective explanations.