中文摘要：

采用功能磁共振成像（Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging，fMRI）技术对熟悉主题说明文阅读过程因果推理加工进行研究，探讨说明文阅读过程中读者是否能够自发进行因果推理加工，以及阅读焦点的存在是否会对说明文阅读过程中的因果推理加工产生影响。结果表明，读者在熟悉主题说明文阅读过程中能够自动进行推理加工，负责推理加工的主要脑区为额叶（尤其是额下回）、顶叶下部及双侧楔前叶等区域。在熟悉主题说明文阅读过程中，阅读焦点的存在一定程度上使读者的认知加工资源集中在对与焦点相关的推理关系的加工上。

英文摘要：

Inference was a tool to establish coherence of the text and provided necessary insurance for correct comprehension. The study of inference in discourse comprehension using functional magnetic resonance imaging （fMRI） was a rather recent, but exciting development research area. The existing fMRI researches of inference in discourse comprehension nearly all based on narrative, studies which based on expository hadn＇t been reported yet. Now, researchers had a clear consensus that inference was coded automatically on-line during narrative reading. Expository is another important literary form, inference in expository comprehension has been extensively investigated in behavioral paradigms, but it was somewhat surprising that there still great debated about if local coherence could be coded automatically during expository reading or not. And till now, the definitely and consistently explanation has not been coincided yet. Meanwhile, it was less known about the neural substrates of inference process in expository comprehension. In this study, brain activations of inference processing in familiar topics expository text comprehension were measured using fMRI, which aimed to investigate whether readers could drawn inference automatically during expository reading and pointed out the core brain area of inference processing in expository reading. Meanwhile, Mo had pointed out that when there existed reading focus in text, readers will make inference around the focus on their own initiative. So another aim of this test was to make sure whether focus-based reading will influence the inference process of expository reading. Participants were asked to read 80 passages which include five or six sentences that differed whether or not an inference needed to be drawn to understand them. Each sentence was present for 3 seconds. Half of the passages were focus-based, and half were not. The questions were about the text but not concerned with the inference. There whole test was divided into 5 runs and there were 16 trials in eac