国际法研究缺乏实证使得国际法不像“法”,且影响其结论的可信性。中国国际法研究之所以缺乏实证,原因在于国际法体系不够完善、传统学术方法的影响及实践资信透明度不够。对于普通研究者而言,加强国际法的实证研究不妨从法条和案例的深度分析开始。
To study international law without empirical method causes the international law not to be "law" and also influences its conclusions' credibility. The shortage of empirical factors in the research of international law in China is mainly because the system of international law is not perfect, the traditional academic way still has its effects and the practice of Chinese international law is not transparent. Research fellows may begin with the intensive analysis of statutory provisions and judicial cases to improve the empirical study of international law.