故意违反法律显示一件仲裁奖品的犯罪在第 20 款修正案 VI 的结束被提供给人们中华民国的刑法。因为看法严厉地在它申请的含意和范围上被划分,如此的一条罪是可能的被误解。另外,恰当的食物不是可以操作的。法律的违背的措辞不应该在一些法律被包括,作为莫测高深的法律用语。费用是冗余的立法的产品,其食物肯定被看作一些空白的纸。罪的创造不尊敬仲裁,并且移开它的怪癖。犯罪的起诉破坏国际仲裁的职业。因此,罪应该被撤消。在诉讼错误地被仲裁的地方,并且伤害被引起的聚会,刑法和另外的法律将用作疗法。
The crime of deliberately rendering an arbitral award in violation of law was provided at the end of Article 20 of the Amendment VI to the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Such a crime is likely to be misunderstood because views are sharply divided on its implication and scope of application. In addition, pertinent provisions are not manipulable. The wording of violation of law should not be included in articles of the law, as legalese. The charge is the product of redundant legislation, whose provisions are bound to be considered as pieces of blank paper. The creation of the crime disrespects arbitration, and removes the peculiarities of it. The charge of the crime undermines the profession of international arbitration. Therefore, the crime should be repealed. Where cases were arbitrated wrongly, and social harms were caused, criminal law and other laws would serve as remedies.