中文摘要：

围绕《纽约时报》关于利用CRISPR/Cas9技术修改人类胚胎基因的两篇报道展开,从批评话语分析角度出发,在Wodak的历史语篇分析法框架内,探讨了报道如何使用各种话语策略建构群内和群外并探讨其背后动因。通过互文性交叉检验发现：《纽约时报》把中国、中国科学家和黄军就的研究消极地建构为群外,而把英国科学家及尼亚坎的实验积极地建构为群内。《纽约时报》在建构中英人类胚胎基因编辑上的差异源自其特定意识形态、政治立场和价值观念,符合其长期扭曲中国、联盟英国的政治意图。

英文摘要：

This research focuses on two reports in New York Times about using the CRISPR/Cas9 technique on editing human embryos. From the perspective of Critical Discourse Analysis and within the framework of Wodak＇s DiscourseHistorical Approach,it explores how discursive strategies are used to construct in-groups and out-groups in the reports and the hidden reasons. Through mutual testing of intertextuality,it is found that China,Chinese scientists and Huang＇s research are negatively represented as out-groups while British researchers and Niakan＇s experiment are constructed as in-groups. The negative representation of China,Chinese scientists and their research and the positive representation of British researchers and their experiment in New York Times are driven by its specific ideology,political stance and values,which is consistent with its political intention of distorting China and aligning Britain.