中文摘要：

不同发展阶段的古村落应采取不同的发展模式，开发模式的选取必须依据其潜力与现状的组合状况，潜力代表未来的可能与希望，现状则表明目前发展的状态，二者的组合可以说明现状与潜力的差距阱及对古村落所处可持续发展的阶段类型；选取7个村落，依据市场吸引力和坚固性双指标，对其潜力分析；构建可持续发展评价指标体系，利用FoxPro软件及SPSS软件对其可持续发展现状进行分析，根据组合状况划分可持续发展类型；从每一类型中选取一个，在指出保护区模式、城镇化模式以及社区参与模式特点后，归纳判别标准作为模式选择的重要依据，采取相关人士评价的方法，计算其遗产保护、旅游开发和社区发展的指数，辨别出时间轴上不同阶段的历史文化名村应采取的旅游发展模式，以期对古村落多维属性持续发展提供借鉴。

英文摘要：

Each time there are great changes in productive forces, there must be a new ideology as its driving force. Historic Cultural Village presents the advanced culture, and tells us a new idea of ＂conserve the re-source and to achieve sustainable development＂. Now the development of Historic Cultural Village is back-ward, often in the form of being marginalized in many aspects, such as in the construction of new socialist countryside, culture tourism and heritage protection. All the researches show us that developing tourism in Historic Cultural Village is a effective way to resolve the contradiction between new idea and present situa- tion. From 2003, the Ministry of Construction,the State Cultural Relics Bureau choose some villages as ＂Na-tional Historic Cultural Village＂, which meeting the flowing three features. This is a symbol of the establish- ment of our selection and protection system. The name of National Historic Cultural Village is infecting an affirmance of ancient villages, which shows great potentialities in the development, but now they are fall be-hind. Many scholars study Historic Cultural Village on their value feature, the relationship between tourism development and protection, the appraisal of tourist value and so on, and obtain many research results, which can hardly resolve brass tacks. There are three-dimensional attributes of Historic Cultural Village： the basic one is settlement; the epiphytic one is heritage and the derivative tourism resource, which also means three levels in its sustainable development： the promotion of settlement; protection of heritage and exploitation of tourism resource.