中文摘要：

一、问题的提出《尚书·召诰》、《尚书·洛诰》、《左传·昭公三十二年》、《逸周书·作雒解》、《史记·周本纪》等早期文献都记载了西周初年在洛阳盆地营建洛邑或成周的事件，何尊阳等西周早期金文已经记载成周，说明周仞确实存在营建成周之事。李民先生在1982年提出西周的成周和洛邑是一回事。叶万松等先生在1984年通过考察洛阳盆地西周时期的考古材料并结合相关文献，把“洛邑城址”的位置指向洛河北岸的“渡河之滨”，初步提出周初营建的洛邑和成周为一城。

英文摘要：

In the late Western Zhou Dynasty, the Chengzhou City located to the north of the Luo River and crossing the Chan River declined and the new city at present-day Hanqi Village was planned and constructed. The burial materials and textual records related to the Luoyang Basin showed that the location of the new-built ＂Chengzhou＂ City was transferred eastward from the north of Luo River to the present-day Hanqi Village. This new plan and construction had complicated historic background; the most conspicuous problem was that during the reign of King Xuan of the Western Zhou Dynasty, the Zhou court was at the climax of the warfare between the east and the west, and the Hanqi Zhou City was very probably built in the reign of King Xuan, and the clan of Duke Mu of Shao （Shao Bohu）, who was one of the most important supreme ministers of King Xuan, might have participated in the construction of the new Chengzhou City.