以Monte Carlo模拟方法对投资组合中风险资产的收益率数据进行t分布的随机生成为基础,引入风险价值、期望不足作为投资组合保险策略绩效评价指标,将OBPI策略、CPPI策略和TIPP策略的绩效与B&H策略、CM策略的绩效进行比较,发现:基于风险价值、期望不足与基于标准差、SHARP比率的绩效评价不一致;基于风险价值、期望不足的绩效评价反映了高风险高回报的一般规律,而将标准差、SHARP比率作为度量风险的指标并不支持这一规律。
By using Monte Carlo simulation method, on the basis of the randomly generated return of risk assets of portfolio with t distribution, we have introduced VaR and ES as performance indicators of portfolio insurance, and compared OBPI strategy, CPPI strategy and TIPP strategy with B&H and CM strategies. The empirical result shows that there is contradiction between the performances of portfolio insurance based on VaR and ES and on Standard Deviation and SHARP ratio; and the law of high risk with high return is supported by VaR and ES, but not by Standard Deviation and SHARP ratio.