位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
甲状腺结节加负压与无负压细针穿刺的对比研究
  • ISSN号:1005-8001
  • 期刊名称:《影像诊断与介入放射学》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:R736.1[医药卫生—肿瘤;医药卫生—临床医学]
  • 作者机构:安徽医科大学上海临床学院/上海市第十人民医院超声医学科,上海200072
  • 相关基金:国家自然科学基金(No:81401477); 上海市人才发展基金(No:2012045)
中文摘要:

目的比较加负压(FNAC)及无负压(FNNAC)状态下行甲状腺结节细针穿刺活检细胞学诊断结果的差异,及对结节良恶性鉴别诊断的价值。方法回顾性分析了322例行超声引导下持续负压(FNAC)组156例或无负压(FNNAC)组166例的细针穿刺细胞学检查的甲状腺结节。根据2015年关于甲状腺结节与分化型甲状腺癌的ATA最新指南及Bethesda报告系统对细胞学结果分类,比较两种细针穿刺方法在细胞学结果中的差异。以手术病理结果及临床随访为金标准,比较两种方法在鉴别甲状腺结节良恶性的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性中的临床价值。结果FNAC对比FNNAC的两种细针穿刺方法的细胞学结果分别为:不能诊断9(5.8%)比16(9.6%),良性66(42.3%)比55(33.1%),没有明确意义的非典型或滤泡型病变(AUS/FLUS)20(12.8%)比41(24.7%),滤泡型肿瘤或可疑滤泡型肿瘤(FN)2(1.3%)比1(0.6%),可疑恶性(SUSP)22(14.1%)比22(13.3%),恶性37(21.1%)比31(18.7%)。在最终经手术病理或随访证实的229例病例中(手术病理证实130例,随访证实99例),FNAC FNNAC两种细针穿刺细胞学检查方法鉴别甲状腺结节良恶性的敏感度为82.7%(43/52)比71.9%(41/57);特异度为79.3%(46/58)比85.5%(53/62);阳性预测值为78.2%(43/55)比82.0%(41/50);阴性预测值为85.2%(46/54)比76.8%(53/69);准确性为80.9%(89/110)比79.0%(94/69)(P均〉0.05)。结论在有确定意义的细胞学结果中,FNAC的诊断效能优于FNNAC,但在鉴别甲状腺结节良恶性诊断价值中无显著差异性。

英文摘要:

Objective To compare the diagnostic efficacy between fine needle aspiration cytology(FNAC) and fine needle non-aspiration cytology(FNNAC) in 322 thyroid lesions. Methods The cytologic results of FNAC(156) and FNNAC(166) were reviewed and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of diagnosing malignant thyroid nodule were determined. Results The cytologic results between FNAC and FNNAC were : 9(5.8%) vs 16(9.6%) for unsatisfactory samples, 66(42.3%) vs 55(33.1%) for benign findings, 20(12.8%) vs 41(24.7%) for atypical or follicular changes, 2(1.3%) vs 1(0.6%) for follicular neoplasm, 22(14.1%) vs 22(13.3%) for suspected malignancy, and 37(21.1%)vs 31(18.7%) for malignancy(P〈0.05). The 25 unsatisfactory samples and 68 samples without surgical pathology confirmation or follow-up were exclude from analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 130 surgically confirmed lesions and 99 benign nodules on 6 month-follow-up were : 82.7%(43 / 52) vs 71.9%(41 /57); 79.3%(46 / 58) vs 85.5%(53 / 62); 78.2%(43 / 55) vs 82.0%(41 / 50); 85.2%(46 / 54) vs 76.8%(53 / 69); 80.9%(89 / 110) vs 79.0%(94 / 69) for FNAC and FNNAC(P〈0.05). Conclusion FNAC is slightly better than FNNACfor cytological diagnosis of thyroid nodules without statistical difference.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《影像诊断与介入放射学》
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 主管单位:中华人民共和国教育部
  • 主办单位:中山大学
  • 主编:孟悛非
  • 地址:中国广州市竹丝岗二马路5号龙珠大厦写字楼2楼
  • 邮编:510062
  • 邮箱:yxzdyjr@126.com
  • 电话:020-87331859
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1005-8001
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:44-1391/R
  • 邮发代号:46-221
  • 获奖情况:
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 中国中国科技核心期刊
  • 被引量:4940