在近些年的法理学讨论中,我国学者在力推"法律家长主义"这一理论主张,并希望将其运用于具体的法律实践当中。然而,由于忽视了立法的存在及其内在价值,"法律家长主义"实际上遵循了一种简单的单线式二元论证路径,并由此导致其在理论建构中的缺陷,以及在道德论证上的失误。
In recent years,some scholars introduced to our country a theory-legal paternalism,and tried to apply it to certain specific legal cases. However,due to the ignorance of the legislation and its intrinsic value,the"legal paternalism"actually follows a simple line of argument,named duality-argument,which not only causes a theoretical fallacy,but a moral fault in the moral philosophy.